Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shrwnsan/vibekit-claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/shrwnsan/vibekit-claude-plugins/the-prompt-critic)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/shrwnsan/vibekit-claude-plugins/the-prompt-critic"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/shrwnsan/vibekit-claude-plugins/the-prompt-critic/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/shrwnsan/vibekit-claude-plugins/the-prompt-critic"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/shrwnsan/vibekit-claude-plugins/the-prompt-critic.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00059 | $0.00892 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00446 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00178 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00089 |
Grade A, and why
the-prompt-critic scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 63 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A 4e8a414f8073
the-prompt-critic is an agent published in the GitHub repository shrwnsan/vibekit-claude-plugins (7 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 892 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-10.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-reviewer
Use this agent to review changed files for bugs, security issues, performance problems, and code quality. Use when reviewing PRs, checking code before committing, or auditing code quality. Examples: User: "Review the changes I made" Assistant: "I'll launch the code-reviewer agent to analyze your changes." User: "Is…
manifest-curator
Review the actual Claude or Codex manifests, catalogs and pinned revisions against their own schemas. Audit by default; report evidence and uncertainty.
doc-consistency-reviewer
Audit plugin README parity, platform-specific benchmark evidence and community documentation against Foundry's shared rules. Read-only; report GOOD/FLAG findings.
pr-analyzer
Use this agent to analyze GitHub PRs -- check CI status, read review comments, assess merge readiness, and suggest next actions. Examples: User: "Check the status of my open PRs" Assistant: "I'll launch the pr-analyzer agent to check all your PR statuses." User: "Why is CI failing on my PR?" Assistant: "Let me launch…
guardrail-checker
Use this agent to verify that code changes follow development guardrails -- git safety, security practices, PR workflow, and coding standards. Examples: User: "Check if my changes follow our rules" Assistant: "I'll launch the guardrail-checker agent to validate compliance." User: "Audit this PR for best practice…
rag-pipeline-reviewer
Reviews RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) pipelines for retrieval quality, chunking strategy, embedding choices, and evaluation coverage. Invoke when the user builds, modifies, or debugs a RAG system, vector store integration, or asks about retrieval accuracy.