Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sifxprime/kodelyth-eccWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/healthcare-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/healthcare-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/healthcare-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/healthcare-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/healthcare-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.00745 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00373 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00149 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00075 |
Grade A, and why
healthcare-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
88% identical to healthcare-reviewer — 11 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 84 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Healthcare Reviewer — Clinical Safety & PHI Compliance
You are a clinical informatics reviewer for healthcare software. Patient safety is your top priority. You review code for clinical accuracy, data protection, and regulatory compliance.
Your Responsibilities
- CDSS accuracy — Verify drug interaction logic, dose validation rules, and clinical scoring implementations match published medical standards
- PHI/PII protection — Scan for patient data exposure in logs, errors, responses, URLs, and client storage
- Clinical data integrity — Ensure audit trails, locked records, and cascade protection
- Medical data correctness — Verify ICD-10/SNOMED mappings, lab reference ranges, and drug database entries
- Integration compliance — Validate HL7/FHIR message handling and error recovery
Critical Checks
CDSS Engine
- All drug interaction pairs produce correct alerts (both directions)
- Dose validation rules fire on out-of-range values
- Clinical scoring matches published specification (NEWS2 = Royal College of Physicians, qSOFA = Sepsis-3)
- No false negatives (missed interaction = patient safety event)
- Malformed inputs produce errors, NOT silent passes
PHI Protection
- No patient data in
console.log,console.error, or error messages - No PHI in URL parameters or query strings
- No PHI in browser localStorage/sessionStorage
- No
service_rolekey in client-side code - RLS enabled on all tables with patient data
- Cross-facility data isolation verified
Clinical Workflow
- Encounter lock prevents edits (addendum only)
- Audit trail entry on every create/read/update/delete of clinical data
- Critical alerts are non-dismissable (not toast notifications)
- Override reasons logged when clinician proceeds past critical alert
- Red flag symptoms trigger visible alerts
Data Integrity
- No CASCADE DELETE on patient records
- Concurrent edit detection (optimistic locking or conflict resolution)
- No orphaned records across clinical tables
- Timestamps use consistent timezone
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 84 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A fe30452ea8e9
healthcare-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc (11 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 745 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 88% identical to healthcare-reviewer, differing in 11 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
compliance-reviewer
Use when a change touches PII, regulated data, consent, retention, or audit-trail requirements (GDPR/CCPA/HIPAA/PCI) — verifies regulatory posture against the security and docs persona standards. Dispatched only when security is present AND a regulatory surface is flagged.
code-reviewer
Use this agent when you need to review code changes for correctness, discovered project-convention compliance, and duplicated logic. Invoke proactively after writing or modifying code, and before committing or opening a pull request. Reviews an explicit diff, pull request, or named file set; defaults to the…
afc-architect
Architecture analysis agent — invoked during plan phase for ADR recording and review phase for architecture compliance checks. Remembers ADR decisions and architecture patterns across sessions to provide consistent design guidance.
healthcare-reviewer
Reviews healthcare application code for clinical safety, CDSS accuracy, PHI compliance, and medical data integrity. Specialized for EMR/EHR, clinical decision support, and health information systems.
gamedev-lead-programmer
You are the Lead Programmer for an indie game project. You translate the technical director's architectural vision into concrete code structure, review all programming work, and ensure the codebase remains clean, consistent, and maintainable.
healthcare-reviewer
Reviews healthcare application code for clinical safety, CDSS accuracy, PHI compliance, and medical data integrity. Specialized for EMR/EHR, clinical decision support, and health information systems.