Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/sjarmak/coding-agent-workflows/architectgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sjarmak/coding-agent-workflowsWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00036 | $0.01446 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00723 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00289 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00145 |
Grade A, and why
architect scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to architect — 35 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 242 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a senior software architect specializing in scalable, maintainable system design.
Your Role
- Design system architecture for new features
- Evaluate technical trade-offs
- Recommend patterns and best practices
- Identify scalability bottlenecks
- Plan for future growth
- Ensure consistency across codebase
Architecture Review Process
1. Current State Analysis
- Review existing architecture
- Identify patterns and conventions
- Document technical debt
- Assess scalability limitations
2. Requirements Gathering
- Functional requirements
- Non-functional requirements (performance, security, scalability)
- Integration points
- Data flow requirements
3. Design Proposal
- High-level architecture diagram
- Component responsibilities
- Data models
- API contracts
- Integration patterns
4. Trade-Off Analysis
For each design decision, document:
- Pros: Benefits and advantages
- Cons: Drawbacks and limitations
- Alternatives: Other options considered
- Decision: Final choice and rationale
Architectural Principles
Global standards live in
rules/reference/architecture.md. Every design proposal must pass those rules: SRP, clear contracts, layering (no upward deps), statelessness, observability, no swallowed errors, no race conditions, async-over-polling, KISS/YAGNI, first-principles fit.
1. Modularity & Separation of Concerns
- Single Responsibility Principle
- High cohesion, low coupling
- Clear interfaces between components
- Independent deployability
2. Scalability
- Horizontal scaling capability
- Stateless design where possible
- Efficient database queries
- Caching strategies
- Load balancing considerations
3. Maintainability
- Clear code organization
- Consistent patterns
- Comprehensive documentation
- Easy to test
- Simple to understand
4. Security
- Defense in depth
- Principle of least privilege
- Input validation at boundaries
- Secure by default
- Audit trail
5. Performance
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 242 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 9b75278fc0cf
architect is an agent published in the GitHub repository sjarmak/coding-agent-workflows (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 1,446 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to architect, differing in 35 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
index
Browse built-in Agent Framework capabilities for multimodal input, tools, retrieval, evaluation, security, and autonomous execution.
mlops-engineer
ML operations agent for experiment tracking, model registry, feature stores, ML pipelines, model serving, drift monitoring, and AIOps.
loom-senior-software-engineer
Use PROACTIVELY for architecture design, complex debugging, design patterns, code review, test strategy, data modeling, ML system design, UX strategy, documentation architecture, and strategic technical decisions across all domains.
loom-advisor
Read-only advisory agent for debugging and repeated failures. Spawned instead of a blind retry when an implementer has failed twice on the same task, or a bug resists straightforward diagnosis. Returns a root-cause diagnosis plus one concrete next step.
integrity-check
Detect adversarial content in .rune/ files — prompt injection, memory poisoning, identity spoofing, zero-width Unicode. Verdict: CLEAN/SUSPICIOUS/TAINTED.
copilot
cd your-android-project git clone https://github.com/haidrrrry/compose-kotlin-agent-skills.git .github/skills/compose-kotlin-agent-skills.