Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/snowmead/questionably-ultrathinkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/snowmead/questionably-ultrathink/cove-claim-qs)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/snowmead/questionably-ultrathink/cove-claim-qs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/snowmead/questionably-ultrathink/cove-claim-qs/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/snowmead/questionably-ultrathink/cove-claim-qs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/snowmead/questionably-ultrathink/cove-claim-qs.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00135 | $0.01938 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00068 | $0.00969 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00027 | $0.00388 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00194 |
Grade A, and why
cove-claim-qs scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 305 lines · 135 tokens per session scan A 0ec687a6e9ec
cove-claim-qs is an agent published in the GitHub repository snowmead/questionably-ultrathink (2 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 135 tokens to every session and 1,938 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
do-setup-assistant
Autonomous Durable Objects project scaffolder. Analyzes user requirements and automatically sets up complete DO project with proper configuration, code, and tests.
quality-reviewer
Reviews code quality, architecture, and best practices. Second stage of the two-stage review gate. Only invoked after spec compliance passes.
dar-skeptic
You are a Skeptic. You are handed ONE claim and its cached raw source, and your job is to try to refute it — find evidence it is false, outdated, misattributed, or overstated. You are the defense against fooling ourselves. You score points for successfully refuting a claim, but you are penalized heavily for wrongly…
eeat
Documents EEAT evidence, gaps, authorship, proof, and trust signals for Agentic SEO project.
keyword-research
Runs keyword research with DataForSEO when enabled and produces normalized keyword evidence for clusters and content.
serp-extract
Extracts and normalizes SERP snapshots with provider metadata, organic results, and SERP features.