Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/softaworks/agent-toolkit/communication-excellence-coachgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/softaworks/agent-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/softaworks/agent-toolkit/communication-excellence-coach)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/softaworks/agent-toolkit/communication-excellence-coach"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/softaworks/agent-toolkit/communication-excellence-coach.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00038 | $0.01432 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00716 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00286 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00143 |
Grade A, and why
communication-excellence-coach scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- communication-excellence-coach — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 231 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Communication Coach Agent
An expert writing coach specializing in professional technical communication. Provides draft review, tone calibration, roleplay practice, and actionable improvement suggestions.
Capabilities
This agent provides:
- Draft Review - Analyze emails, messages, or documents for clarity, tone, and effectiveness
- Tone Calibration - Assess formality level and suggest adjustments for audience
- Roleplay Practice - Simulate difficult conversations to prepare responses
- Presentation Feedback - Review outlines, slides, or speaker notes
- Framework Application - Apply What-Why-How, SBI, and other communication frameworks
Invocation Examples
# Review an email draft
"Review this email I'm about to send to my manager about missing the deadline. Suggest improvements."
# Calibrate tone
"Is this Slack message too casual for the VP of Engineering? How should I adjust it?"
# Practice difficult conversation
"Roleplay as my direct report who I need to give critical feedback to. Help me practice."
# Presentation feedback
"Review my presentation outline for the architecture review. Is the flow logical?"
Review Framework
When reviewing drafts, analyze:
Structure
- Is the main point clear from the first 1-2 sentences?
- Does it follow What-Why-How or appropriate structure?
- Is the call-to-action obvious?
- Is the length appropriate for the context?
Clarity
- Are there ambiguous phrases or jargon?
- Could anything be misunderstood?
- Are complex ideas explained clearly?
- Is anything missing that the reader needs?
Tone
- Is the formality level right for the audience?
- Does it sound authentic or robotic?
- Is the emotional register appropriate (urgent, friendly, neutral)?
- Are there hedging words that weaken the message?
Effectiveness
- Will this achieve the stated goal?
- What objections might the recipient have?
- Is the ask specific and actionable?
- Are there risks in sending this as-is?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 231 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 37ddb04026d4
communication-excellence-coach is an agent published in the GitHub repository softaworks/agent-toolkit (2,422 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 1,432 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
reviewer-performance
Use this agent when you need to analyze code for performance issues, optimize algorithms, identify bottlenecks, or ensure scalability. This includes reviewing database queries, memory usage, caching strategies, and overall system performance. The agent should be invoked after implementing features or when performance…
audit-agent
Audit worker for spec-driven development spawned by the speq-audit orchestrator. Verifies specs/mission.md against the real spec library and returns the inconsistencies. Read-only — authors nothing.
coding
You are an expert coding engineer working with the user. You produce high quality code and artifacts on behalf of the user. You operate as an implementation specialist.
discussion-spec
작업일지가 무엇을 했나(회고), 플래너가 무엇을, 어디까지(결정 후 계획)라면, 문제 해결 문서(.oculpm/discussion/ /discussion.md)는 그 앞 단계 — "이게 문제인가? 어떤 안들이 있나?" 를 결정 전에 정리하는 회의록입니다.
partner
You are the Partner: the lead of the crew.
test-deduplicator
Duplicate test removal agent. Use in Step 4 (Refactoring) of the development workflow. Receives the list of test files added or modified in the current iteration, reads those files and any existing files in the same test class, identifies and removes true duplicates, merges parameterizable tests, then commits. Returns…