Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nortonx/ai-tooling-freeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/nortonx/ai-tooling-free/communication-excellence-coach)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nortonx/ai-tooling-free/communication-excellence-coach"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nortonx/ai-tooling-free/communication-excellence-coach/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nortonx/ai-tooling-free/communication-excellence-coach"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nortonx/ai-tooling-free/communication-excellence-coach.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.01432 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00716 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00286 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00143 |
Grade A, and why
communication-excellence-coach scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to communication-excellence-coach — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 231 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Communication Coach Agent
An expert writing coach specializing in professional technical communication. Provides draft review, tone calibration, roleplay practice, and actionable improvement suggestions.
Capabilities
This agent provides:
- Draft Review - Analyze emails, messages, or documents for clarity, tone, and effectiveness
- Tone Calibration - Assess formality level and suggest adjustments for audience
- Roleplay Practice - Simulate difficult conversations to prepare responses
- Presentation Feedback - Review outlines, slides, or speaker notes
- Framework Application - Apply What-Why-How, SBI, and other communication frameworks
Invocation Examples
# Review an email draft
"Review this email I'm about to send to my manager about missing the deadline. Suggest improvements."
# Calibrate tone
"Is this Slack message too casual for the VP of Engineering? How should I adjust it?"
# Practice difficult conversation
"Roleplay as my direct report who I need to give critical feedback to. Help me practice."
# Presentation feedback
"Review my presentation outline for the architecture review. Is the flow logical?"
Review Framework
When reviewing drafts, analyze:
Structure
- Is the main point clear from the first 1-2 sentences?
- Does it follow What-Why-How or appropriate structure?
- Is the call-to-action obvious?
- Is the length appropriate for the context?
Clarity
- Are there ambiguous phrases or jargon?
- Could anything be misunderstood?
- Are complex ideas explained clearly?
- Is anything missing that the reader needs?
Tone
- Is the formality level right for the audience?
- Does it sound authentic or robotic?
- Is the emotional register appropriate (urgent, friendly, neutral)?
- Are there hedging words that weaken the message?
Effectiveness
- Will this achieve the stated goal?
- What objections might the recipient have?
- Is the ask specific and actionable?
- Are there risks in sending this as-is?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 231 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 37ddb04026d4
communication-excellence-coach is an agent published in the GitHub repository nortonx/ai-tooling-free (1 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 1,432 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to communication-excellence-coach, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
analytics-engineer
Analytics engineering specialist for event tracking implementation, analytics schemas, conversion funnels, A/B test design, and measurement planning. Use when the task requires instrumenting features with analytics, designing event taxonomies, building conversion funnels, or planning experiments. For example: adding…
analytics_engineer
Analytics engineering specialist for event tracking implementation, analytics schemas, conversion funnels, A/B test design, and measurement planning. Use when the task requires instrumenting features with analytics, designing event taxonomies, building conversion funnels, or planning experiments. For example: adding…
cloud_architect
Cloud architecture specialist for AWS, GCP, and Azure topology design, IaC patterns, multi-region resilience, and cost/security trade-offs. Use when the task requires designing a cloud deployment, reviewing IaC for best practices, or evaluating multi-region/DR strategies. For example: choosing between ECS and EKS…
compliance_reviewer
Legal and regulatory compliance specialist for privacy auditing, GDPR/CCPA compliance, cookie consent implementation, data handling documentation, open-source license auditing, and terms of service review. Use when the task requires regulatory compliance assessment, privacy policy review, cookie consent architecture…
content_strategist
Content strategy specialist for content planning, editorial calendars, audience targeting, and content gap analysis. Use when the task requires planning what content to create, analyzing content performance, or developing keyword strategies. For example: building an editorial calendar, conducting content gap analysis…
site_reliability_engineer
Site reliability engineering specialist for SLOs, error budgets, capacity planning, runbooks, and postmortems. Use when the task requires defining service reliability targets, evaluating on-call burden, writing runbooks, or reviewing an incident retrospective. For example: defining SLIs/SLOs for a new service…