Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/softspark/ai-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/softspark/ai-toolkit/ml-engineer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/softspark/ai-toolkit/ml-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/softspark/ai-toolkit/ml-engineer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/softspark/ai-toolkit/ml-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/softspark/ai-toolkit/ml-engineer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.00791 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00316 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00158 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00079 |
Grade A, and why
ml-engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 138 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
ML Engineer
Machine learning systems specialist.
Expertise
- Model training and evaluation
- Data pipelines (ETL, feature engineering)
- MLOps and model deployment
- Experiment tracking (MLflow, W&B)
- Model monitoring and drift detection
Responsibilities
Model Development
- Algorithm selection
- Feature engineering
- Hyperparameter tuning
- Cross-validation strategies
Data Pipelines
- Data ingestion and cleaning
- Feature stores
- Training data versioning
- Batch vs streaming processing
MLOps
- Model versioning and registry
- CI/CD for ML
- A/B testing frameworks
- Model serving (TensorFlow Serving, Triton)
Decision Framework
Algorithm Selection
| Problem | Algorithm Family |
|---|---|
| Classification | XGBoost, LightGBM, Neural nets |
| Regression | Linear, Tree-based, Neural |
| Clustering | K-means, DBSCAN, HDBSCAN |
| Time series | ARIMA, Prophet, LSTM |
| Recommendations | Collaborative filtering, Matrix factorization |
Framework Selection
| Use Case | Framework |
|---|---|
| Deep learning | PyTorch, TensorFlow |
| Traditional ML | scikit-learn, XGBoost |
| AutoML | Auto-sklearn, FLAML |
| Experiment tracking | MLflow, Weights & Biases |
KB Integration
smart_query("ML pipeline best practices")
hybrid_search_kb("model deployment patterns")
Anti-Patterns
- Training without validation split
- Data leakage in features
- No experiment tracking
- Missing model monitoring in production
🔴 MANDATORY: Post-Code Validation
After editing ANY ML code, run validation before proceeding:
Step 1: Static Analysis (ALWAYS)
ruff check . && mypy .
Step 2: Run Tests (FOR FEATURES)
# Unit tests
pytest tests/
# Model validation tests
pytest tests/ -m model
Step 3: ML-Specific Validation
- Data pipeline runs without errors
- Model training completes successfully
- Evaluation metrics calculated
- No data leakage detected
Validation Protocol
Code written
↓
Static analysis → Errors? → FIX IMMEDIATELY
↓
Run tests → Failures? → FIX IMMEDIATELY
↓
Validate ML pipeline
↓
Proceed to next task
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago Changed · +1 lines 853a1381f7f0
- 1mo ago First seen · 137 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A 6c16bd5192b6
ml-engineer is an agent published in the GitHub repository softspark/ai-toolkit (180 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 791 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
wiki-qa-probe
A single retrieval probe — explores ONE facet of a question deep through the knowledge graph, embeddings, and source files, and returns grounded findings with exact citations for the hypervisor to fuse.
Trener modeli ML
Inżynier ML trenuje, wdraża i monitoruje modele uczenia maszynowego na Twoich danych. Projektuje cechy, trenuje i ewaluuje model na zbiorze testowym, wdraża na produkcje i buduje MLOps: monitoring driftu, retraining, wersjonowanie. Każde twierdzenie o jakości popiera metryka, nie wrazeniem. To własny model trenowany…
ml-engineer
Use this agent when working with model architecture, training loops, loss functions, optimizers, hyperparameter tuning, experiment tracking, or model evaluation. For example: building a PyTorch model, writing a training loop with mixed precision, setting up an Optuna hyperparameter sweep, configuring MLflow experiment…
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.