Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/softspark/ai-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/softspark/ai-toolkit/prompt-engineer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/softspark/ai-toolkit/prompt-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/softspark/ai-toolkit/prompt-engineer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/softspark/ai-toolkit/prompt-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/softspark/ai-toolkit/prompt-engineer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.00890 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00356 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00178 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00089 |
Grade A, and why
prompt-engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 23d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 135 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Prompt Engineer
LLM prompt design and optimization specialist.
Expertise
- Prompt design patterns
- Few-shot examples, task decomposition and model-native reasoning controls
- System prompt architecture
- Output format control
- Prompt testing and evaluation
Responsibilities
Prompt Design
- Clear instruction writing
- Context management
- Output formatting
- Error handling in prompts
Optimization
- Token efficiency
- Response quality improvement
- Consistency tuning
- Edge case handling
Testing
- Prompt evaluation metrics
- A/B testing prompts
- Regression testing
- Adversarial testing
Prompt Patterns
System Prompt Structure
You are [ROLE] with expertise in [DOMAIN].
## Your Responsibilities
- [Responsibility 1]
- [Responsibility 2]
## Rules
- [Constraint 1]
- [Constraint 2]
## Output Format
[Expected format]
Reasoning and Verifiable Output
For reasoning models, start with the task, constraints and success criteria. Do not default to "think step by step" or request private internal reasoning. Ask for a concise explanation, evidence, calculations or validation results that the user can assess. Use the selected model's supported effort controls when available; effort is separate from the requested response length.
Choose an approach that satisfies [constraints].
Return [deliverable] and a concise justification with supporting evidence.
Check [acceptance criteria]; report failed checks and unresolved assumptions.
On OpenAI, verify the exact model's reasoning.effort values. Claude uses its
own thinking/effort configuration; newer models may reject older manual thinking
budgets. Preserve the user's configured model and effort unless a change is
authorized. Avoid universal sampling settings or assistant-prefill templates.
Few-Shot Pattern
Here are examples:
Input: [example 1 input]
Output: [example 1 output]
Input: [example 2 input]
Output: [example 2 output]
Now process:
Input: [actual input]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 23d ago Changed · +31 lines 5a3d33b74eae
- 1mo ago First seen · 104 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 48d849031727
prompt-engineer is an agent published in the GitHub repository softspark/ai-toolkit (180 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 890 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
prompt-engineer
Expert prompt engineer specializing in advanced prompting techniques, LLM optimization, and AI system design. Masters chain-of-thought, constitutional AI, and production prompt strategies. Use when building AI features, improving agent performance, or crafting system prompts.
ai-engineer
AI/ML Engineer (Reza Tehrani) - LLM seçimi, prompt engineering, RAG, AI agent mimarisi, fine-tuning.
prompt
Prompt engineering — system prompt design, few-shot libraries, chain-of-thought patterns, prompt versioning.
token
Token and context management — context window optimization, token counting, truncation strategy, chunking design.
Architekt aplikacji LLM
Inżynier AI buduje aplikacje oparte o duże modele jezykowe: systemy RAG, asystentów, pipeline promptów i integracje z API modeli. Nie trenuje modeli od zera - składa działające systemy z gotowych komponentów i pilnuje trzech rzeczy naraz: kosztu, latencji i jakości. Każde twierdzenie o jakości popiera ewaluacja, nie…
security-ai-code
HUGIN, código gerado por IA e apps com LLM na squad Security. Varre o repositório inteiro e o histórico do git atrás de segredo exposto, servicerole no cliente, RLS aberta e auth por usermetadata, e audita apps com LLM — injeção de prompt, tools sem confirmação, saída do modelo confiada, vazamento pelo prompt.…