product-manager

product-manager is an agent for Claude Code from spica-engine/spica. It costs 37 tokens per session (972 once invoked), scanned A, original, AGPL-3.0.

A product-management advisor for defining software features, user stories, requirements, priorities, and GitHub issues.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to write requirements, create issues, shape user stories, prioritise work, and assess whether features solve the right problem.
Why use it?
It helps connect implementation work with user needs and business goals.

Agent for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/spica-engine/spica/product-manager
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/spica-engine/spica

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for product-manager

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/spica-engine/spica/product-manager.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/spica-engine/spica/product-manager)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/spica-engine/spica/product-manager"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/spica-engine/spica/product-manager.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 37 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 972 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00037 $0.00972
Opus 5 $0.00018 $0.00486
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00194
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00097

Measured 3d ago against content hash bacb27dabb8e, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

product-manager scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/agents/product-manager.md · 129 lines

The source is not reproduced here

Licensed AGPL-3.0

The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 129 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A bacb27dabb8e

Subscribe to this mod's changes

product-manager is an agent published in the GitHub repository spica-engine/spica (100 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 972 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-01.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

docs-reviewer

Use this agent during PR review to answer two docs questions about any PR. Coverage, on every diff - does the change alter user-facing behavior that astro-docs documents in prose, without updating those docs? Compliance, when the diff touches docs content (astro-docs/src/content/ or astro-docs/sidebar.mts) - do the…

nrwl/nx · 171 tokens

ci-watcher

Polls Nx Cloud CI pipeline and self-healing status. Returns structured state when actionable. Spawned by /nx-cloud-ci-monitor command to monitor CI Attempt status.

nrwl/nx · 37 tokens

comment-analyzer

Use this agent during PR review to check that a PR's comments and doc-comments are TRUE. It verifies every load-bearing claim in a changed comment against the code it describes, and flags comments the diff left stale. It does not ask for more comments - this repo's committed CLAUDE.md rules default to no comment, so…

nrwl/nx · 122 tokens

security-analyzer

Use this agent during PR review to hunt injection-class vulnerabilities in a PR's changes - command injection, zip-slip and path traversal, prototype pollution, SSRF, credential leakage, and unsafe deserialization. It reports a finding only when untrusted data actually crosses a trust boundary into a dangerous sink…

nrwl/nx · 89 tokens

performance-analyzer

Use this agent during PR review to analyze the runtime performance of a PR's changes along two axes - (1) resource footprint (unnecessary CPU or memory usage) and (2) execution efficiency (does the code run quickly, avoid redundant work, and scale with workspace size). It reports a finding only when the cost is real…

nrwl/nx · 105 tokens

alternative-approach

Use this agent during PR review to independently design alternative solutions to the problem a PR solves and contrast them with the PR's chosen approach. It reports a finding only when an alternative is materially better (root-cause vs symptom fix, reuse of an existing utility, large complexity reduction) or when the…

nrwl/nx · 96 tokens