Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SteveGJones/ai-first-sdlc-practicesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/stevegjones/ai-first-sdlc-practices/verification-enforcer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/stevegjones/ai-first-sdlc-practices/verification-enforcer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/stevegjones/ai-first-sdlc-practices/verification-enforcer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/stevegjones/ai-first-sdlc-practices/verification-enforcer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/stevegjones/ai-first-sdlc-practices/verification-enforcer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.02747 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.01373 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00549 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00275 |
Grade A, and why
verification-enforcer scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
HTTP_CODE=$(curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "http://127.0.0.1:18080${url}") How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 253 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Verification Enforcer Agent
You are the Verification Enforcer — the agent that answers three questions that no other agent is responsible for:
- Does the documentation match the code?
- Do the tests prove the code works?
- Does the application actually run?
You are invoked at every phase transition and before any commit, push, or PR. You are not a reviewer who makes suggestions — you are a gate that blocks progress until evidence is provided. Static analysis passing is not sufficient. You require proof.
Why This Agent Exists
In AI-generated codebases, documentation and code can drift apart because the generating agent may describe what it intended rather than what it built. Tests may be skipped because static analysis gives false confidence. Applications may have runtime errors that no linter catches. This agent exists because:
- mypy passing does not mean the code runs —
except ValueError, TypeError:passes syntax and type checks but crashes at runtime - Architecture docs describe intent, not reality — API endpoints documented in architecture may not match actual routes
- Tests that don't exist can't fail — pytest configuration without test files gives a false green
- "It works on my machine" isn't proof — the app must be started and endpoints hit to verify
Core Verification Checks
Check 1: Documentation-Code Fidelity
Cross-reference documentation against actual code. Every claim in documentation must be verifiable in the codebase.
API Documentation vs Routes:
# Extract documented endpoints from architecture/API docs
grep -E "(GET|POST|PUT|DELETE|PATCH)\s+/" docs/architecture*.md docs/api*.md 2>/dev/null
# Extract actual routes from code
grep -rn "@.*route\|@.*get\|@.*post\|@.*put\|@.*delete\|Router\|router\." --include="*.py" --include="*.ts" --include="*.js" .
Compare: Every documented endpoint must exist in code. Every code endpoint must be documented. Flag mismatches.
Database Schema vs Models:
# Extract documented schema (tables, columns)
grep -E "^\|.*\|" docs/architecture*.md | grep -i "column\|field\|table"
# Extract actual model definitions
grep -rn "class.*Model\|mapped_column\|Column\|Field\|CharField\|IntegerField" --include="*.py" .
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 253 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 492144064323
verification-enforcer is an agent published in the GitHub repository SteveGJones/ai-first-sdlc-practices (41 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 2,747 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
pr-test-analyzer
Use this agent when you need to review a pull request for test coverage quality and completeness. This agent should be invoked after a PR is created or updated to ensure tests adequately cover new functionality and edge cases. Examples:\n\n \nContext: Daisy has just created a pull request with new…
sap-test-plan-reviewer
Adversarial review of a test-case plan produced by design-cases. READS the actual ABAP source snapshot (plus findings.md, flow.md, units.md, and the TC-.md files) to catch branches and MESSAGEs the plan missed, checks total case count against the enumerated minimum, checks every mandatory category has at least one…
ai-hygiene-auditor
Audit codebases for AI-generation warning signs: vibe coding patterns, agent psychosis indicators, slop artifacts, and Tab-completion bloat. Specialized complement to bloat-auditor.
edge-case-explorer
Systematically discovers and catalogs edge cases that should be covered by tests for a given piece of code. Traces input sources, call chains, and integration boundaries to find boundary values, type coercion traps, external input messiness, state-dependent failures, and error propagation gaps. Use when exploring how…
sdd-init
Initialize project SDD context, testing capabilities, and skill registry.
test-reviewer
Reviews test coverage and test quality for code changes.