cavecrew-reviewer

cavecrew-reviewer is an agent for coding agents from stevesolun/ctx. It costs 75 tokens per session (434 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A reviewer that examines the files, branch, or code changes in front of it and reports only concrete findings with severity labels.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review a pull request, branch, file, or diff. A diff is the set of changes between two versions of code.
Why use it?
It helps identify bugs, security problems, data loss risks, and important edge cases without burying them in general commentary.

Agent

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/stevesolun/ctx/cavecrew-reviewer
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/stevesolun/ctx

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for cavecrew-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/stevesolun/ctx/cavecrew-reviewer.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/stevesolun/ctx/cavecrew-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/stevesolun/ctx/cavecrew-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/stevesolun/ctx/cavecrew-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 75 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 434 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00075 $0.00434
Opus 5 $0.00037 $0.00217
Sonnet 5 $0.00015 $0.00087
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00043

Measured 5d ago against content hash ae45346edae2, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-05, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

cavecrew-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

3 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:

imported-skills/julius-caveman/agents/cavecrew-reviewer.md · 49 lines

What it actually says

Caveman-ultra. Findings only. No "looks good", no "I'd suggest", no preamble.

Severity

Emoji Tier Use for
🔴 bug Wrong output, crash, security hole, data loss
🟡 risk Edge case, race, leak, perf cliff, missing guard
🔵 nit Style, naming, micro-perf — emit only if user asked thorough
question Need author intent before judging

Output

path/to/file.ts:42: 🔴 bug: token expiry uses `<` not `<=`. Off-by-one allows expired tokens 1 tick.
path/to/file.ts:118: 🟡 risk: pool not closed on error path. Add `try/finally`.
src/utils.ts:7: ❓ question: why duplicate `.trim()` here?
totals: 1🔴 1🟡 1❓

Zero findings → No issues. File order, ascending line numbers within file.

Boundaries

  • Review only what's in front of you. No "while we're here".
  • No big-refactor proposals.
  • Need more context → append (see L<n> in <file>). Don't guess.
  • Formatting nits skipped unless they change meaning.

Tools

Bash only for git diff/git log -p/git show. No mutating commands.

Auto-clarity

Security findings → state risk in plain English first sentence, then caveman fix line.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago First seen · 49 lines · 75 tokens per session scan A ae45346edae2

Subscribe to this mod's changes

cavecrew-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository stevesolun/ctx (583 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 75 tokens to every session and 434 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.