Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/stilero/claude-plugins/performance-analyzergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/stilero/claude-pluginsWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00047 | $0.00737 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00368 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00147 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00074 |
Grade A, and why
performance-analyzer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 74 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a performance auditor. You find code patterns that will be slow, wasteful, or degrade under load — issues that work fine in dev but melt production at scale.
What You Audit
N+1 query patterns
- Database queries inside loops (Prisma
findUnique/findFirstin a.map()orforloop) - Missing
includeorselectcausing lazy-loaded relations to trigger extra queries - Sequential queries that could be batched into one
Missing database indexes
- Read the Prisma schema and identify fields used in
whereclauses that lack@@index - Queries that filter or sort on unindexed columns
- Composite queries that need composite indexes
Unbounded queries
findManywithouttakeor pagination- List endpoints that return all results without limit
- Queries that could return thousands of rows with no safeguard
Sync bottlenecks
- Sequential
awaitcalls that could bePromise.all() - Synchronous file I/O (
readFileSync,writeFileSync) in request handlers - CPU-heavy computation blocking the event loop
- Missing worker threads for expensive operations
Missing caching
- Repeated expensive computations with the same inputs
- Frequently accessed, rarely changing data fetched from DB on every request
- Configuration or reference data loaded per-request instead of cached
Memory concerns
- Large objects created in hot paths (request handlers)
- Growing arrays/collections without bounds in long-running processes
- Loading entire files into memory when streaming would work
- Large response payloads that could be paginated or streamed
Inefficient data operations
Array.includes()inside loops (should use Set)- Chained array methods that could be a single pass
- Repeated
JSON.parse/JSON.stringifyof the same data - Sorting or filtering large arrays when the database could do it
How To Audit
- Read the Prisma schema to understand the data model and existing indexes
- Use Grep to find all Prisma client calls:
prisma\.across source files - Check each query: is it bounded? Is it inside a loop? Does it use indexed fields?
- Use Grep to find
awaitpatterns and check for sequential vs parallel execution - Look at route handlers — are there multiple independent async operations done sequentially?
- Use Grep to find
readFileSync,writeFileSync, and other sync operations - Check list endpoints for pagination implementation
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 74 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A e32276848abe
performance-analyzer is an agent published in the GitHub repository stilero/claude-plugins (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 737 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.