tech-debt-audit

tech-debt-audit is a plugin for Claude Code from stilero/claude-plugins. Its manifest loads nothing; the 1 skill, 1 command, 9 agents it bundles cost 577 tokens per session together, scanned A, original, MIT.

A plugin that starts 11 parallel agents to inspect a codebase for technical debt, then groups their findings into actionable issues. Technical debt means code or design choices that make future changes harder or riskier.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to audit a codebase, consolidate technical-debt findings, and optionally create corresponding GitHub issues.
Why use it?
It helps reveal maintenance problems that may be missed in a single review and organizes overlapping findings into a clearer set of issues.

Plugin for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code plugin manifest.

Good fit Use it to audit a codebase, consolidate technical-debt findings, and optionally create…

Compare 6 plugins from other repositories ↓
Install in Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add stilero/claude-plugins/plugin install tech-debt-audit
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/stilero/claude-plugins

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for tech-debt-audit

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/stilero/claude-plugins/tech-debt-audit.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/plugins/stilero/claude-plugins/tech-debt-audit)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/stilero/claude-plugins/tech-debt-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/stilero/claude-plugins/tech-debt-audit.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session not measured What this adds to a session before it is invoked.
When invoked not measured The manifest loads nothing itself; its 1 skill, 1 command, 9 agents cost 577 tokens a session between them.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Security

Grade A, and why

tech-debt-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/tech-debt-audit/.claude-plugin/plugin.json · 9 lines

What it actually says

{
  "name": "tech-debt-audit",
  "version": "1.1.0",
  "description": "Spawns 11 parallel agents to audit a codebase for technical debt, groups findings into actionable issues, and offers GitHub issue creation",
  "author": {
    "name": "Daniel Eliasson"
  }
}
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 6d ago First seen · 9 lines scan A 1a7aac36a6b6

Subscribe to this mod's changes

tech-debt-audit is a plugin published in the GitHub repository stilero/claude-plugins (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. Its token cost is not measured: this kind of file is read by the harness, not the model. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.