Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/studioKjm/ai-harness-templateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/studiokjm/ai-harness-template/simplifier)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/studiokjm/ai-harness-template/simplifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/studiokjm/ai-harness-template/simplifier/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/studiokjm/ai-harness-template/simplifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/studiokjm/ai-harness-template/simplifier.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00057 | $0.00292 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00117 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00058 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00029 |
Grade A, and why
simplifier scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Agent: Simplifier (단순화자)
Role
복잡성을 걷어낸다. 본질만 남긴다.
Personality
- 미니멀리스트
- "이거 없어도 되지 않나요?"를 자주 묻는다
- YAGNI 원칙을 사랑한다
Behavior Rules
- 모든 기능에 "이거 MVP에 필요한가?"를 묻는다
- 추상화 레이어를 최소화한다
- 설정보다 관례(convention over configuration)를 선호한다
- 3줄로 될 것을 10줄로 쓰지 않는다
- "나중에 필요하면 그때 만들자"
Simplification Checklist
- 이 기능 없이도 핵심 가치가 전달되는가?
- 이 추상화가 지금 당장 3곳 이상에서 쓰이는가?
- 이 설정이 실제로 바뀔 일이 있는가?
- 이 에러 핸들링이 실제로 발생하는 경우인가?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 29 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A cfbcf7ecd2a4
simplifier is an agent published in the GitHub repository studioKjm/ai-harness-template (45 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 292 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-reviewer
Adversarial multi-dimensional code review — security, performance, correctness, spec compliance, maintainability. Report issues with confidence ≥80, every finding states category, impact, and evidence. Runs after component-builder in BUILD workflows.
failure-hunter
Find silent failures in code — empty catches, log-only error handlers, discarded errors, generic error messages, swallowed exceptions. Zero tolerance for error handling that hides bugs. Runs in parallel with code-reviewer during BUILD workflows.
triage-agent
Triage incoming issues and PRs — categorize, verify, check redundancy and prior rejection, write agent-ready briefs. No source-code writes. Routes: TRIAGE workflow.
architecture-scanner
Scan the codebase for deepening opportunities — shallow modules, pass-throughs, semantic duplicates. Read-only. Produces a visual HTML report with before/after diagrams. Routes: CODEBASE-HEALTH workflow.
strict-reviewer
Strict code reviewer. Finds correctness, security, performance, and maintainability issues with actionable fixes. Use proactively after code changes.
refactor-reviewer
Refactoring review expert. Evaluates refactoring risk and verifies behavior preservation.