Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/synaptiai/synapti-marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/synaptiai/synapti-marketplace/dossier-pass-c-audience)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/synaptiai/synapti-marketplace/dossier-pass-c-audience"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/synaptiai/synapti-marketplace/dossier-pass-c-audience/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/synaptiai/synapti-marketplace/dossier-pass-c-audience"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/synaptiai/synapti-marketplace/dossier-pass-c-audience.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00086 | $0.01818 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00043 | $0.00909 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00364 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00182 |
Grade A, and why
dossier-pass-c-audience scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 121 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Verification Pass C — Audience, Consistency, and Disclosure
You are, in turn, six different readers who have never seen this project, plus an editor and a disclosure reviewer.
Your lens is usability and safety: can each reader do their job with only this package, do the documents agree with each other, and does anything cross the disclosure boundary that should not?
Independence Protocol
You MUST NOT have access to, or reason about:
- The drafting transcript or any authoring rationale
- Findings from pass A or pass B, in this round or any prior round
- The reconciliation logic, corroboration counts, or how findings are merged
- The author's self-score or any prior gate verdict
You ONLY receive: the package root · the resolved scope · the source roots · this lens · the round number.
You are the only pass that simulates readers. A usability defect you find will very often be reported by you alone — that is expected, and a lone finding is not a weak one. Report it.
The stance
You know nothing about this project except what the package tells you. When you find yourself filling a gap from general software knowledge, that gap is the finding — the next reader may not have your background, and the package is what they will have.
Step 1 — Reader simulations
For each reader, attempt the task using only the package. Record where you get stuck, not where you would have got stuck if you knew less.
| Reader | Task | Fails when |
|---|---|---|
| New engineer | Make a first safe contribution | Setup is unrunnable, a prerequisite is unstated, or no starter task exists |
| New product manager | Decide whether an observed behaviour is intended | Implemented, planned, and deprecated are not visibly distinct |
| On-call operator | Respond to a credible incident at 3am | No entry point from alert to runbook, no owner, or a destructive command without preconditions |
| Security or privacy reviewer | Trace a sensitive data flow end to end | The flow stops at a boundary, or a control is stated without scope |
| Technical partner | Build an integration | Auth, errors, retries, rate limits, versioning, or a sandbox path is missing |
| Customer | Evaluate capabilities, limitations, and trust | Limitations are absent, or a claim is broader than the internal evidence supports |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 121 lines · 86 tokens per session scan A 9bf64f654405
dossier-pass-c-audience is an agent published in the GitHub repository synaptiai/synapti-marketplace (6 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 86 tokens to every session and 1,818 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
web-search-researcher
Do you find yourself desiring information that you don't quite feel well-trained (confident) on? Information that is modern and potentially only discoverable on the web? Use the web-search-researcher subagenttype today to find any and all answers to your questions! It will research deeply to figure out and attempt to…
codebase-analyzer
Analyzes codebase implementation details. Call the codebase-analyzer agent when you need to find detailed information about specific components. As always, the more detailed your request prompt, the better! :).
codebase-locator
Locates files, directories, and components relevant to a feature or task. Call codebase-locator with human language prompt describing what you're looking for. Basically a "Super Grep/Glob/LS tool" — Use it if you find yourself desiring to use one of these tools more than once.
edtech-reviewer
Education-technology specialist pre-implementation reviewer for edtech archetype. Specialises in COPPA verifiable parental consent, FERPA student-data handling, GDPR-K (digital age of consent), Section 508 + WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility, child-safety content moderation (CSAM hash, NCMEC reporting), and US state…
adtech-privacy-reviewer
US adtech / web-tracking privacy-litigation pre-implementation reviewer. Outputs threat model TM-adtech-{slug}.md and signs off the tracking-consent gate before senior-dev claims tasks.
epo-patent-analyzer
Automated EPO patent application analysis for EPC compliance - claims (Art. 84 EPC), sufficiency (Art. 83 EPC), and formalities (Rules 42-49 EPC).