Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to systemowiec/ai-agents-workspace-starter. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/systemowiec/ai-agents-workspace-starter/main/.claude/agents/quality-gate.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/systemowiec/ai-agents-workspace-starterWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/systemowiec/ai-agents-workspace-starter/quality-gate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/systemowiec/ai-agents-workspace-starter/quality-gate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/systemowiec/ai-agents-workspace-starter/quality-gate.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.00242 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00121 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00048 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00024 |
Grade A, and why
quality-gate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Read and apply strictly:
.agents/roles/quality-gate.md- scoring system, checklist, report formatAGENTS.md- project global rules.agents/learnings/gotchas.md- known gotchas
Workflow
- Read implementation report from
docs/specs/{layer}/{PREFIX}-NNN/impl-*.md - Review ALL changed files listed in the report
- Perform scoring according to 6 categories from
.agents/roles/quality-gate.md - Save review in
docs/specs/{layer}/{PREFIX}-NNN/review-{role}.md
Verdicts
-
= 95% - PASS (merge allowed)
- 90-94% - CONDITIONAL (minor fixes, re-review not required)
- < 90% - FAIL (VETO, merge blocked, fixes required)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 28 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 45c75d606fc7
quality-gate is an agent published in the GitHub repository systemowiec/ai-agents-workspace-starter (2 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 242 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
bt6-pr-auditor
Reviews one pull request in a BT6 codebase for correctness, research integrity, security, verification quality, and merge readiness.
Reviewer
Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.
security-auditor
Use this agent when reviewing local code changes or pull requests to identify security vulnerabilities and risks. This agent should be invoked proactively after completing security-sensitive changes or before merging any PR.
dotnet-architecture-reviewer
Reviews a .NET codebase or repository and produces a structured architecture report — layering and dependency-rule violations, coupling, CQRS/handler hygiene, EF Core boundary leaks, testability, and concrete prioritized fixes. Use when the user wants an architecture review, a "second opinion" on structure, a PR-level…