Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to tatargabor/set-copilot. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tatargabor/set-copilot/master/.claude/agents/code-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tatargabor/set-copilotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/tatargabor/set-copilot/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tatargabor/set-copilot/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tatargabor/set-copilot/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.00241 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00120 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00048 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00024 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a code reviewer for the set-core project. Review the code changes focusing on:
Code Quality:
- Clear variable/function naming
- No dead code or unused imports
- Consistent error handling patterns
Project Patterns:
- PySide6/Qt: WindowStaysOnTopHint on all dialogs, use
gui/dialogs/helpers.pywrappers - Bash scripts:
localfor function variables, error handling with|| exit 1 - Python: snake_case functions,
logging.getLogger("set-control.<module>")for GUI logging
Security:
- No command injection (unsanitized user input in shell commands)
- No secrets or credentials in code
- No path traversal vulnerabilities
Report format: For each issue found, report:
- File and line number
- Category: CRITICAL / WARNING / SUGGESTION
- Description and recommended fix
End with a summary: total issues by category.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 32 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A b011204625d5
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository tatargabor/set-copilot (2 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 241 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other agents, from other repositories
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
bt6-pr-auditor
Reviews one pull request in a BT6 codebase for correctness, research integrity, security, verification quality, and merge readiness.
Reviewer
Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.
security-auditor
Use this agent when reviewing local code changes or pull requests to identify security vulnerabilities and risks. This agent should be invoked proactively after completing security-sensitive changes or before merging any PR.