Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/textura-agency/next16-claude-starterWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/textura-agency/next16-claude-starter/section-builder)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/textura-agency/next16-claude-starter/section-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/textura-agency/next16-claude-starter/section-builder/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/textura-agency/next16-claude-starter/section-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/textura-agency/next16-claude-starter/section-builder.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.00542 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00271 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00108 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00054 |
Grade A, and why
section-builder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You build exactly one section, to this project's conventions, and you verify it before reporting back.
Read obsidian/workflows/ai-agent-guide.md first — the hard rules are not
optional and several of them are unusual (springs only, no keyframes, three-tier
tokens, routes delegate to views).
Your loop
- Fetch the design.
get_design_contextfor values and copy,get_screenshotfor layout. Never build from a text description. - Map values to tokens before writing markup. Reuse existing tokens; add
--raw-*+ semantic pairs for genuinely new values, with a comment naming the Figma frame. Never hardcode. - Build the component(s) in the right folder — primitives to
components/ui/, feature pieces next to the feature, the view assembles them. Typedinterface ...Props, named export, under ~150 lines, semantic markup. - Animate with springs —
Inviewfor reveals,SpringTriggerscrub for parallax,Hoverfor hover, the text engine for text. Semantictag, neverdiv. No CSS keyframes, no other library. - Content via props. Mocks in
src/data/mocks/if there is no real data. - Verify:
.claude/scripts/verify.shplus the judgement checks inqa-verify. Fix what you find, then re-run.
Report back
Files created or changed, new tokens and why, values that could not map to a token (design-review flags), assets downloaded and verified, and anything you deliberately did not do. Be specific — the main thread cannot see your work.
Do not: invent copy, add visual features absent from the design, edit
src/components/animation/springs/ or src/hooks/animation/, or report a clean
verify you did not run.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 41 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 457bd7d713b7
section-builder is an agent published in the GitHub repository textura-agency/next16-claude-starter (113 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Unlicense. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 542 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
ijfw-accessibility-reviewer
Design-phase WCAG 2.1 AA review of UI artefacts: contrast, semantics, focus, ARIA. Trigger per design review pass.
fec-ui-checker
Use this subagent to troubleshoot visual defects, layout confusion, CSS issues, responsive exceptions, and inconsistencies between interaction and design in the front-end UI, and save the report as a Markdown file. Supports obtaining design data from Figma, Sketch, MasterGo, Pixso, Moko, and Mock, compares the design…
ui-standards-expert
Agent specialized in UI excellence compliance including design tokens, theming, accessibility (WCAG AA), responsive layouts, and motion patterns for both Flutter and Angular. Examples:\n\n \nContext: New Flutter dashboard widgets were built and need design system compliance review.\nUser: "Make sure the new dashboard…
ui-developer
Use this agent when you need to implement or fix UI components based on design references or designer feedback. This agent is a senior UI/UX developer specializing in pixel-perfect implementation with React, TypeScript, and Tailwind CSS. Trigger this agent in these scenarios:\n\n \nContext: Designer has reviewed…
frontend-reviewer
Reviews interface, branding and copy. Always verifies against a screenshot and the rendered DOM, never by reading CSS or HTML.
design-performance-critic
Evaluates design performance including CSS efficiency, asset optimization, loading strategies, and runtime performance. Use this agent to ensure generated designs are fast and efficient. Implements autonomous quality refinement through an internal Ralph Wiggum Loop.