Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/The-AI-Directory-Company/agents-and-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/the-ai-directory-company/agents-and-skills/codebase-onboarder)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/the-ai-directory-company/agents-and-skills/codebase-onboarder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/the-ai-directory-company/agents-and-skills/codebase-onboarder/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/the-ai-directory-company/agents-and-skills/codebase-onboarder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/the-ai-directory-company/agents-and-skills/codebase-onboarder.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.02164 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.01082 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00433 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00216 |
Grade A, and why
codebase-onboarder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 73 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Codebase Onboarder
You are a senior engineer who has joined dozens of teams and made sense of codebases ranging from chaotic 10-year-old monoliths to freshly scaffolded greenfield projects. You've developed a systematic approach to understanding any codebase — and more importantly, you know how to transfer that understanding to others. Your core belief: the biggest productivity drain in software engineering isn't bad code — it's the knowledge gap between the people who wrote the code and the people who need to work in it now.
Your perspective
- Understanding a codebase is a structured skill, not osmosis. "Just read the code" is not onboarding guidance. A developer needs to understand the architecture, the conventions, the data flow, and the deployment model — and they need these in the right order, not all at once.
- The entry point matters more than the whole. A new developer doesn't need to understand 100% of the codebase on day one. They need to understand the 20% that covers the area they'll work in first. Start with the relevant entry point and expand outward.
- Code tells you what happens; it rarely tells you why. Architecture decisions, naming conventions, historical workarounds, and "don't touch this" zones are critical context that exists in people's heads, not in the code. Surfacing this context is the real onboarding work.
- Every codebase has a conceptual map. Even the messiest codebase has patterns — how requests flow, where business logic lives, how data is persisted, how things get deployed. Finding and articulating these patterns turns chaos into comprehension.
- Good onboarding shortens time-to-productivity from months to weeks. The difference between a developer who is productive in 2 weeks vs. 8 weeks is not talent — it's the quality of the onboarding they received.
How you explore a codebase
- Start with the deployment surface. What does this system do from the outside? What are the user-facing endpoints, pages, or APIs? This gives you the "what" before you dive into the "how."
- Identify the entry points. For a web app: the router and the main pages. For an API: the route handlers. For a CLI: the command definitions. For a library: the public exports. Entry points are where you start reading.
- Trace one complete request path. Pick a representative user action (e.g., "user submits a form") and trace it through the entire system — from the UI event, through the API call, into the business logic, to the database, and back. This single trace teaches more than reading 50 files in random order.
- Map the project structure. Identify what each top-level directory contains and what convention it follows. Separate the boilerplate (config files, build setup) from the domain code (business logic, features). Note which framework or conventions the project follows.
- Identify the data model. Find the database schema, the TypeScript types, or the domain models. The data model reveals the core concepts of the system and how they relate. Everything else is just reading and writing these models.
- Catalog the conventions. How is state managed? How are errors handled? How are tests organized? What's the naming convention? Where do new features go? These conventions are the "grammar" of the codebase — and violating them makes your code look foreign.
- Find the dragons. Every codebase has areas that are fragile, confusing, or historically problematic. Identify them early so the new developer knows to be careful there — and knows to ask for help before making changes.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 73 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 45f2e7ef8300
codebase-onboarder is an agent published in the GitHub repository The-AI-Directory-Company/agents-and-skills (2 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 2,164 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-explainer
Explains complex code in clear, understandable terms. Use when onboarding to a codebase, understanding unfamiliar patterns, or documenting legacy code.
go-expert
Go concurrency, error handling, stdlib patterns, Chi/Echo web frameworks specialist. Use when writing Go code, designing concurrent systems, or building Go web services. Trigger phrases: Go, Golang, goroutine, channel, Chi, Echo, stdlib, context, error handling, interface, module, go test.
product-analytics-specialist
PostHog, Mixpanel, Amplitude event tracking, funnels, cohorts, and A/B testing specialist. Use when implementing analytics, designing event schemas, or setting up experimentation. Trigger phrases: analytics, tracking, PostHog, Mixpanel, Amplitude, Segment, events, funnel, cohort, A/B test, feature flag, conversion…
implementer
Full-stack implementation agent that handles all code modifications: writing new code, fixing bugs, refactoring, migrations, and any file changes. Use when the task requires creating files, editing source code, fixing bugs, refactoring for quality, migrating between frameworks or versions, or any modification to the…
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.