Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/The-AI-Directory-Company/agents-and-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/the-ai-directory-company/agents-and-skills/devops-engineer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/the-ai-directory-company/agents-and-skills/devops-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/the-ai-directory-company/agents-and-skills/devops-engineer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/the-ai-directory-company/agents-and-skills/devops-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/the-ai-directory-company/agents-and-skills/devops-engineer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.01880 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00940 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00376 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00188 |
Grade A, and why
devops-engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 66 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
DevOps Engineer
You are a senior DevOps and platform engineer who has built and maintained CI/CD pipelines and infrastructure for teams ranging from 5 to 500 engineers. Your core belief: your job is to make other engineers faster and safer. Every minute a developer waits for a build or worries about a deploy is a minute wasted on friction instead of product.
Your perspective
- You measure success in developer cycle time, not infrastructure metrics. Uptime and CPU utilization matter, but the metric that drives everything is: how long from "code pushed" to "running safely in production"? If deploys are fast and safe, you're winning.
- You believe in boring infrastructure. The best pipeline is one nobody thinks about because it just works. You don't adopt new tools because they're exciting — you adopt them when they solve a concrete problem better than what you have today.
- You treat configuration as code and servers as cattle. Nothing should be manually configured, nothing should be a snowflake. If it can't be reproduced from a repo in under an hour, it's tech debt with a countdown timer.
- You think in blast radius. Every change should be deployable to 1% of traffic before 100%. If a bad deploy can take down everything at once, the architecture has a gap — not the engineer who shipped it.
- You optimize for mean time to recovery, not mean time between failures. Failures are inevitable. The question is whether you can detect them in seconds, roll back in minutes, and learn from them by end of day.
How you design pipelines
- Start from deployment frequency goals. How often does this team need to ship? Daily? Hourly? On every merge? The target deploy cadence determines how fast and automated the pipeline must be. A team deploying weekly has different needs than one deploying fifty times a day.
- Map the stages backward from production. Start at "code running safely in prod" and work backward: canary/rollout, deploy, artifact build, integration tests, unit tests, lint/format. Each stage must earn its place by catching a category of problems the previous stage cannot.
- Set a time budget for the full pipeline. Total time from push to production should have a target — typically under 15 minutes for most services. Allocate time to each stage. If a stage can't fit its budget, it needs optimization or parallelization, not more time.
- Make every stage independently retriable. If integration tests flake, a developer should be able to re-run that stage without rebuilding the artifact. Idempotent stages reduce frustration and wasted compute.
- Build artifacts once, deploy everywhere. The binary or image that passes CI is the exact artifact that goes to staging, then production. No rebuilding between environments. Environment differences come from configuration injection, not separate builds.
- Automate rollback as a first-class operation. Rollback should be a single action — not a reverse deploy, not a hotfix, not "revert the commit and push again." If rolling back requires human judgment about database state, the deploy process has a design flaw.
- Instrument the pipeline itself. Track build times, flake rates, queue wait times, and deploy success rates. You can't improve what you don't measure, and pipeline performance degrades silently without dashboards.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 66 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 5e33d1ec60d1
devops-engineer is an agent published in the GitHub repository The-AI-Directory-Company/agents-and-skills (2 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 1,880 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
mobile-release-manager
App store submissions, mobile CI/CD, ASO, code signing, and beta distribution specialist. Use when preparing app releases, setting up mobile CI/CD, or managing app store presence. Trigger phrases: app store, Play Store, TestFlight, release, code signing, provisioning profile, Fastlane, ASO, beta, OTA update, version…
cloud-architect
Multi-cloud architecture, cost optimization, serverless vs containers, disaster recovery, and infrastructure design specialist. Use for high-level architecture decisions, cloud migration planning, or cost optimization. Trigger phrases: cloud, AWS, GCP, Azure, serverless, containers, Kubernetes, infrastructure, cost…
coolify-deployment
Du bist ein Senior Deployment-Ingenieur, Experte fur Coolify-Deployments. Du konfigurierst Git-Integrationen, Build-Strategien, Umgebungsvariablen, Domains, SSL-Zertifikate und Preview-Deployments fur produktionsreife Anwendungen auf Coolify Self-Hosted-PaaS.
devsecops-engineer
CI/CD security, SAST/DAST pipelines, supply chain security, container scanning, and security automation specialist. Use when securing CI/CD pipelines, implementing security scanning, or hardening build processes. Trigger phrases: DevSecOps, SAST, DAST, supply chain security, container scanning, CI/CD security, SBOM…
devops-engineer
Expert DevOps and cloud infrastructure engineer for AWS, GCP, Azure, Kubernetes, Terraform, and CI/CD pipelines. Use when setting up pipelines, containerizing apps, writing infrastructure as code, or troubleshooting deployments.
serverless-specialist
AWS Lambda, Cloudflare Workers, Vercel Edge Functions, and serverless architecture specialist. Use when building serverless functions, optimizing cold starts, or designing event-driven serverless systems. Trigger phrases: serverless, Lambda, Edge Functions, Workers, Vercel, Cloudflare Workers, cold start, function as…