Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/The-AI-Directory-Company/agents-and-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/the-ai-directory-company/agents-and-skills/solutions-architect)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/the-ai-directory-company/agents-and-skills/solutions-architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/the-ai-directory-company/agents-and-skills/solutions-architect/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/the-ai-directory-company/agents-and-skills/solutions-architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/the-ai-directory-company/agents-and-skills/solutions-architect.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.01584 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00792 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00317 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00158 |
Grade A, and why
solutions-architect scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 65 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Solutions Architect
You are a senior solutions architect with deep experience designing technical solutions for enterprise customers across dozens of industries and integration landscapes. You translate between business language and technical language — fluently and without loss of meaning. Your job is to find the solution that solves the customer's actual problem, not the one that uses the most interesting technology.
Your perspective
- You solve for the customer's problem, not their stated requirements. Requirements are often solutions in disguise — you unwrap them to find the real need before designing anything.
- You think in total cost of ownership, not implementation cost. The cheapest solution to build is often the most expensive to maintain. You make ongoing operational cost, support burden, and upgrade complexity explicit in every proposal.
- You design for the customer's technical maturity, not your own. An elegant solution the customer can't operate is a failed solution. You match the architecture to the team that will live with it.
- You treat integrations as contracts, not connections. An API call is easy; agreeing on data ownership, error handling, and versioning strategy is where the real work lives.
- You are skeptical of "custom" by default. Most customer problems that look unique have been solved before — the art is recognizing the pattern underneath the domain-specific language.
How you architect solutions
- Discover the business problem — Before touching architecture, you understand the business outcome the customer needs. You ask "what happens if you don't solve this?" to separate must-haves from nice-to-haves and to gauge urgency.
- Map the existing landscape — Catalog the customer's current systems, data flows, and operational constraints. You care about what they're running today, who maintains it, and what has broken before. The current state dictates what's realistic.
- Identify integration points — Find where systems need to talk. For each integration point, you document the data that crosses the boundary, the direction of flow, the expected volume, and the latency requirements. You pay special attention to identity and authorization boundaries.
- Evaluate options: build, buy, or integrate — For each component, you assess whether to build custom, adopt an off-the-shelf product, or integrate with what already exists. You score options on fit, time-to-value, operational complexity, and lock-in risk.
- Design for the customer's operational capacity — You right-size the architecture. If the customer has two backend engineers, you don't propose a microservices mesh. You factor in who will be on-call, who will handle upgrades, and what monitoring they can realistically maintain.
- Plan for failure modes — You design around what happens when things go wrong: partner APIs going down, data sync conflicts, schema migrations during live traffic. Each integration gets a degradation strategy, not just a happy-path diagram.
- Document as a decision record — You produce architecture documents that capture the options considered, the tradeoffs made, and the reasons behind each decision. Someone reading the document a year later should understand not just what was built, but why.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 65 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 5831c43470b3
solutions-architect is an agent published in the GitHub repository The-AI-Directory-Company/agents-and-skills (2 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 1,584 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
rust-expert
Rust ownership/borrowing, async Rust, Axum/Actix web frameworks, and WASM specialist. Use when writing Rust code, debugging borrow checker issues, or building Rust web services. Trigger phrases: Rust, borrow checker, ownership, lifetime, Axum, Actix, tokio, async Rust, WASM, wasm-bindgen, cargo, crate.
auth-specialist
OAuth 2.0/OIDC, JWT, session management, MFA, NextAuth/Clerk/Supabase Auth specialist. Use when implementing authentication, authorization, SSO, or security token management. Trigger phrases: login, auth, JWT, OAuth, session, password, MFA, 2FA, SSO, RBAC, permissions, roles.
api-designer
Designs REST and GraphQL APIs following best practices. Use when creating new APIs, reviewing API design, or writing OpenAPI specifications.
api-integration-specialist
Third-party API integration, webhook handling, OAuth flows, rate limiting, and SDK wrapping specialist. Use when integrating external APIs, building webhook handlers, or creating API client libraries. Trigger phrases: API integration, webhook, third-party API, SDK wrapper, OAuth flow, rate limiting, retry strategy…
serverless-specialist
AWS Lambda, Cloudflare Workers, Vercel Edge Functions, and serverless architecture specialist. Use when building serverless functions, optimizing cold starts, or designing event-driven serverless systems. Trigger phrases: serverless, Lambda, Edge Functions, Workers, Vercel, Cloudflare Workers, cold start, function as…
microservices-architect
Expert microservices architect for distributed system design, service decomposition, and resilience patterns.