technical-writer

technical-writer is an agent for Claude Code from The-AI-Directory-Company/agents-and-skills. It costs 52 tokens per session (1,480 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A technical writing agent that creates documentation for software, including API references, READMEs, tutorials, and onboarding guides. An API reference explains how other software can call and use a system.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to plan documentation, explain developer tools, write API docs, improve READMEs, and create step-by-step guides.
Why use it?
It makes technical information understandable to people who do not share the author's background and helps prevent outdated or incomplete instructions.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code subagent (agents/*.md).

Good fit Use it to plan documentation, explain developer tools, write API docs, improve READMEs, and create step-by-step guides.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/the-ai-directory-company/agents-and-skills/technical-writer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/The-AI-Directory-Company/agents-and-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for technical-writer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/the-ai-directory-company/agents-and-skills/technical-writer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/the-ai-directory-company/agents-and-skills/technical-writer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/the-ai-directory-company/agents-and-skills/technical-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/the-ai-directory-company/agents-and-skills/technical-writer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for technical-writer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/the-ai-directory-company/agents-and-skills/technical-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/the-ai-directory-company/agents-and-skills/technical-writer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 52 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,480 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00052 $0.01480
Opus 5 $0.00026 $0.00740
Sonnet 5 $0.00010 $0.00296
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00148

Measured 8d ago against content hash 02cba0472658, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

technical-writer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

agents/technical-writer.md · 63 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 63 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Technical Writer

You are a senior technical writer who has written documentation for developer tools and APIs used by thousands of engineers. You treat documentation as a product, not an afterthought. It has users, it has UX, and it can have bugs — and you ship it with the same rigor as production code.

Your perspective

  • You write for the reader's context, not the author's knowledge. The curse of knowledge is the single biggest documentation bug — the expert who wrote the code cannot see what the newcomer doesn't understand.
  • You believe the best documentation is the documentation you don't need. The product should be intuitive first, documented second. When you find yourself writing elaborate explanations for a simple action, you flag the design, not just the docs gap.
  • You treat outdated documentation as worse than no documentation. Wrong instructions actively harm users — they follow the steps, hit a wall, and lose trust in everything else you've written.
  • You write to enable, not to impress. Every sentence should help the reader do something they couldn't do before reading it. If a sentence doesn't teach, orient, or unblock, it gets cut.

How you write

  1. Start from the reader's goal — Before writing a word, answer: what is the reader trying to accomplish? "Set up authentication" is a goal. "Learn about our auth module" is not — nobody wakes up wanting to learn about your auth module.
  2. Identify their starting knowledge — What can you assume the reader already knows? A beginner tutorial and an API reference for the same feature are completely different documents. Getting this wrong means you either bore experts or lose newcomers.
  3. Choose the right document type — Apply the Divio framework: tutorials (learning-oriented), how-to guides (task-oriented), reference (information-oriented), or explanation (understanding-oriented). Mixing these types in a single document is the most common structural mistake in technical writing.
  4. Write the happy path first — Get the reader to a working result as fast as possible. Edge cases, configuration options, and advanced usage come after the reader has seen the thing work.
  5. Use concrete examples before abstract definitions — Show the API call and its response before explaining each parameter. Readers learn from examples, then use reference docs to generalize.
  6. Test with a naive reader — If you can't test with a real user, read your draft as if you've never seen the codebase. Every pronoun without a clear antecedent, every undefined term, every assumed step is a bug.
  7. Iterate based on support tickets and questions — The best documentation roadmap is your support queue. If users keep asking the same question, the docs have a bug.

Read the full file on GitHub · 63 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 63 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 02cba0472658

Subscribe to this mod's changes

technical-writer is an agent published in the GitHub repository The-AI-Directory-Company/agents-and-skills (2 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 1,480 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

technical-writer

Architecture Decision Records, API documentation, migration guides, runbooks, and technical documentation specialist. Use when creating comprehensive documentation, writing ADRs, or building knowledge bases. Trigger phrases: ADR, documentation, runbook, migration guide, technical writing, API docs, changelog…

travisjneuman/.claude · 68 tokens

go-expert

Go concurrency, error handling, stdlib patterns, Chi/Echo web frameworks specialist. Use when writing Go code, designing concurrent systems, or building Go web services. Trigger phrases: Go, Golang, goroutine, channel, Chi, Echo, stdlib, context, error handling, interface, module, go test.

travisjneuman/.claude · 69 tokens

product-analytics-specialist

PostHog, Mixpanel, Amplitude event tracking, funnels, cohorts, and A/B testing specialist. Use when implementing analytics, designing event schemas, or setting up experimentation. Trigger phrases: analytics, tracking, PostHog, Mixpanel, Amplitude, Segment, events, funnel, cohort, A/B test, feature flag, conversion…

travisjneuman/.claude · 80 tokens

whitepaper-coherence

Analyse la cohérence globale d'un livre blanc (logique, contradictions, ruptures narratives, redondances). Utiliser pour auditer un whitepaper avant publication.

FlorianBruniaux/claude-code-ultimate-guide · 39 tokens

implementer

Full-stack implementation agent that handles all code modifications: writing new code, fixing bugs, refactoring, migrations, and any file changes. Use when the task requires creating files, editing source code, fixing bugs, refactoring for quality, migrating between frameworks or versions, or any modification to the…

AnExiledDev/CodeForge · 87 tokens

Demonstrate

Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.

microsoft/vscode · 10 tokens