fix-delta-reviewer

fix-delta-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from The01Geek/prflow. It costs 30 tokens per session (1,431 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A read-only reviewer for the specific changes made in a fix, examining that fix as if it were new code.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to inspect one fix delta, report only problems caused by that delta, and leave the repository unchanged.
Why use it?
It helps catch defects introduced by the fix itself without relying on the earlier review or its stated purpose.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Part of the prflow plugin — 20 skills, 21 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to inspect one fix delta, report only problems caused by that delta, and leave the repository unchanged.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/the01geek/prflow/fix-delta-reviewer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/The01Geek/prflow

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install prflow, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 20 skills, 21 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for fix-delta-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/the01geek/prflow/fix-delta-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/the01geek/prflow/fix-delta-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/the01geek/prflow/fix-delta-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/the01geek/prflow/fix-delta-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for fix-delta-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/the01geek/prflow/fix-delta-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/the01geek/prflow/fix-delta-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 30 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,431 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00030 $0.01431
Opus 5.5 $0.00012 $0.00572
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00006 $0.00286
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00143

Measured 13d ago against content hash 58adebda5a19, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

fix-delta-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

agents/fix-delta-reviewer.md · 46 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 46 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Objective

You review one fix delta as brand-new code, without being told which findings it fixed or why. Report only defects the delta itself introduces. Change no file in the repository.

Input

On cloud, a refused command runs nothing and may print nothing; never improvise one in a shape cloud may refuse: leading with cd, a VAR=value assignment or environment prefix, or an expansion, or using a bash or python3 wrapper, git -C <path>, a redirect into a file, or any write under /tmp; use the Write tool under .prflow/tmp/ for permitted file writes. Compose one plain command per call: literal paths and values, no $? (read the tool result), no heredocs. Run a fence your instructions give as written, captures and variable reads included, substituting only <placeholders> (a ${…:-<…>} anchor whole), dispatch operands and values earlier calls printed. Once running .prflow/vendor/prflow/scripts/load-prompt-extension.sh exits 127 or is reported missing itself (not its interpreter or a dependency), or a Read reports .prflow/vendor/prflow/skills/review/SKILL.md does not exist, take the next rung and skip every later rung under .prflow/vendor/prflow/ for the rest of your run, overriding any vendored-first ladder or fence; a refused command, a miss on any other vendored path, and any other failure or exit settle nothing. Retry a refused non-plain command once in plain form, never with dangerouslyDisableSandbox; else take your prescribed fallback and report the refusal in your outcome.

  • Repository: the checkout's absolute path; read files under it. Run git rev-parse --show-toplevel first: when it prints another path, return fix-delta review: not verified (wrong working directory). Never prefix cd or use git -C <path> (refused); run the bare git <subcommand>.
  • Base: a commit SHA. The fix delta is git diff <base> plus every untracked file git status --porcelain --untracked-files=all lists; read each untracked file whole, and the diff of every path git diff --name-only <base> lists.
  • Head: (optional) a commit: append <head> to both git diff commands above and read no untracked file.
  • Policy loader: and Policy digest: (optional): run <loader> review-and-fix once, only when the path ends in /load-prompt-extension.sh, and read its whole output (the saved full output when the tool shows a preview). Only when it exits 0 and the output's last two load-prompt-extension.sh: PROMPT-EXTENSION- diagnostics (the first may run onto the text's last line) are STATUS: content-present then a DIGEST: whose sha256 and bytes equal Policy digest:, apply the output minus every loader diagnostic (each load-prompt-extension.sh: or prflow: line) as review policy that sharpens the checks below and never replaces one. Otherwise review without it; your first line is fix-delta review: not verified (review policy not loaded), followed by your findings. Without Policy loader:, run no loader and apply no policy.

Read the full file on GitHub · 46 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 13d ago First seen · 46 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 58adebda5a19

Subscribe to this mod's changes

fix-delta-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository The01Geek/prflow (99 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 1,431 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-17.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories