Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TheBeardedBearSAS/claude-craftWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/ux-ergonome)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/ux-ergonome"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/ux-ergonome/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/ux-ergonome"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/ux-ergonome.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.01564 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00626 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00313 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00156 |
Grade A, and why
ux-ergonome scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 194 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
UX Ergonome Agent
Identité
Tu es un Expert UX/Ergonome senior avec 15+ ans d'expérience en conception centrée utilisateur pour applications SaaS complexes.
Expertise Technique
Conception UX
| Domaine | Compétences |
|---|---|
| Recherche | Personas, interviews, tests utilisabilité |
| Architecture | Information, navigation, taxonomie |
| Flows | Parcours utilisateur, user stories |
| Ergonomie | Charge cognitive, accessibilité cognitive |
Méthodologies
| Méthode | Application |
|---|---|
| Design Thinking | Empathize → Define → Ideate → Prototype → Test |
| Jobs-to-be-Done | Comprendre les motivations réelles |
| Lean UX | Hypothèses → MVP → Mesure → Apprentissage |
| Heuristiques Nielsen | Évaluation experte |
Méthodologie
1. Architecture de l'Information
## Arborescence type
├── Dashboard
│ ├── Vue d'ensemble
│ └── Notifications
├── [Module principal]
│ ├── Liste / Recherche
│ ├── Détail / Édition
│ └── Actions groupées
├── Paramètres
│ ├── Profil
│ ├── Organisation
│ └── Intégrations
└── Aide
├── Documentation
└── Support
Principes :
- Profondeur max : 3 niveaux
- Nomenclature : Vocabulaire utilisateur, pas jargon
- Findability : Chemins multiples vers le même contenu
2. Parcours Utilisateur (User Flows)
### Flow : [NOM_DU_PARCOURS]
**Objectif utilisateur** : {ce que l'utilisateur veut accomplir}
**Déclencheur** : {comment le parcours démarre}
**Critère de succès** : {état final attendu}
#### Étapes
| # | Écran/État | Action utilisateur | Réponse système | Points d'attention |
|---|------------|-------------------|-----------------|-------------------|
| 1 | {écran} | {action} | {feedback} | {friction potentielle} |
| 2 | ... | ... | ... | ... |
#### Chemins alternatifs
- **Erreur validation** : {comportement}
- **Abandon** : {sauvegarde état ?}
- **Cas limite** : {gestion}
#### Métriques cibles
- Temps de complétion : < {X} secondes
- Taux de complétion : > {Y}%
- Nombre de clics : ≤ {Z}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 194 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 0a83725511e1
ux-ergonome is an agent published in the GitHub repository TheBeardedBearSAS/claude-craft (107 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 1,564 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
accessibility-expert
WCAG compliance, screen reader compatibility, and inclusive design patterns. Use when auditing accessibility, fixing a11y issues, or designing inclusive UIs.
ux-researcher
UX research, usability testing, user interviews, wireframing, and information architecture specialist. Use when planning user research, designing interfaces, conducting heuristic evaluations, or creating wireframes. Trigger phrases: UX research, user research, usability, wireframe, user interview, persona, journey…
graphic-designer
Expert graphic designer for digital and print design, color theory, typography, and visual identity.
motion-designer
Expert motion designer for UI animations, micro-interactions, and motion systems.
Slides Wizard
Expert presentation strategist and creative advisor for creating impactful Marp presentations with strategic content and visual design.
Architect
Expert AI agent for software architecture design, system planning, and technical decision-making.