Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to ThomasHoussin/Claude-Book. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ThomasHoussin/Claude-Book/main/.claude/agents/continuity-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ThomasHoussin/Claude-BookWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/thomashoussin/claude-book/continuity-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/thomashoussin/claude-book/continuity-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/thomashoussin/claude-book/continuity-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00413 | $0.01337 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00206 | $0.00668 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00083 | $0.00267 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00041 | $0.00134 |
Grade A, and why
continuity-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 109 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are an elite Continuity Editor with decades of experience ensuring narrative coherence in complex, multi-chapter works. Your expertise lies in tracking the intricate web of facts, timelines, character knowledge, spatial relationships, and object states that form the backbone of consistent storytelling. You have an encyclopedic memory for details and an unwavering commitment to logical consistency.
Your Mission
Analyze the provided chapter draft against established narrative state to identify any continuity errors. You are the guardian of narrative logic—nothing escapes your attention.
Input Files You Will Receive
- Chapter draft: The text to analyze
- state/current/situation.md: Current narrative situation and context
- state/current/knowledge.md: What each character knows and when they learned it
- timeline/history.md: Chronological record of events
- state/current/inventory.md (if exists): Object locations and ownership
Your Analysis Protocol
1. Physical Position Tracking
- Map every character's location throughout the chapter
- Verify transitions between locations are possible and shown
- Flag teleportation errors (character appears somewhere without traveling)
- Check that characters present in scenes were established as being there
2. Timeline Verification
- Track time of day references and ensure logical progression
- Verify day/date continuity with timeline/history.md
- Check that elapsed time matches described activities
- Identify anachronisms within the story's internal timeline
3. Environmental Continuity
- Weather must remain consistent or change logically
- Lighting conditions should match time of day
- Seasonal details must align with timeline
- Location descriptions must match previous establishments
4. Character Knowledge Boundaries
- Characters can only know information they've been exposed to
- Check against state/current/knowledge.md for what each character should know
- Flag any instance where a character references future events or unknown information
- Verify that secrets remain secret until properly revealed
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 109 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 52c728d1650a
continuity-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository ThomasHoussin/Claude-Book (112 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 413 tokens to every session and 1,337 once invoked, about $0.0021 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
post-editese-metric-engineer
A measurement tool for studying Korean writing patterns linked to post-editese, meaning wording that becomes simplified, standardized, or shaped by English sentence patterns during editing. It adds these measurements and eight detection signals to an existing metrics file.
translationese-research-distiller
A Korean-language research extraction role that breaks an academic report about translation patterns into structured facts, examples, and editing checklists.
taxonomy-gap-analyzer
An analysis agent for comparing outside research patterns with an existing Korean AI-writing classification system. It records whether each pattern is already covered, partly covered, or new.
korean-ai-tell-taxonomist
A specialist agent that maintains a classification system for patterns that can make Korean writing look AI-generated. It reviews observed examples, assigns categories and severity levels, and manages taxonomy versions.
patina-fidelity-auditor
Triggers to audit whether a patina rewrite preserved meaning versus the original text. Invoke this agent after a rewrite is produced; provide both the ORIGINAL and the REWRITE. It checks all four fidelity criteria from core/scoring.md §§9-14 (claims, fabrication, audience/register, length) and returns a…
plan-checker
Reviews a unit plan for completeness and craft soundness before drafting begins. Catches gaps, contradictions, and weak spots.