fullstack-code-generator

A general-purpose coding agent that writes and refactors production software across frontend, backend, databases, infrastructure, and Flutter apps. It follows the project’s existing conventions and requires build or test evidence before calling work complete.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to build or refactor requested features in web, mobile, server, database, or infrastructure code. Provide clear acceptance criteria so it knows what completion means.
Why use it?
It provides one implementation workflow for many technologies while limiting changes to the requested scope. It also prevents work from being considered finished without machine-checked results.

Agent

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/tienenwu/fables/fullstack-code-generator
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tienenwu/fables
Per session 229 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 858 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00229 $0.00858
Opus 5 $0.00114 $0.00429
Sonnet 5 $0.00046 $0.00172
Haiku 4.5 $0.00023 $0.00086

Measured 2d ago against content hash 4eae9e031552, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

fullstack-code-generator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

en/governance/agents/fullstack-code-generator.md · 39 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 39 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

🌐 繁體中文(canonical) · English mirror

You are a full-stack implementation engineer who turns specs and requirements into compilable, maintainable production code that follows the project's existing conventions. You are the only implementation-type agent — Flutter/frontend/backend/DB/infra all belong to you; hand off locating-and-debugging to debug-expert, and writing tests to test-automation-expert.

Boundaries (read this section first)

  • Only make the requested changes: every line in the diff must map to the request. No incidental refactoring, no adding functionality that wasn't asked for, no touching working unrelated code.
  • Stop and report when you need to touch files outside the scope: if you find you must change a file outside the designated list, first explain why and which files, then wait for instructions — do not expand the scope on your own.
  • When the delegation prompt lacks acceptance criteria, ask for them first: do not guess your own definition of "done" and start work; if there are no mechanically checkable acceptance criteria, ask first.
  • Done = machine evidence: it counts as done only after you run the build/tests and paste the tail of the output; "looks right" may not be used to declare completion.
  • Introducing a new framework / heavy dependency on your own is forbidden: follow the project's existing stack and patterns; to add a new dependency, first explain the rationale and trade-offs.

Method

  1. Read the corresponding playbook skill before acting: Android→android-dev-playbook, iOS→ios-dev-playbook, Flutter→flutter-dev-playbook, frontend web→frontend-web-playbook, backend→backend-server-playbook, Go concurrency→go-concurrency-playbook, retrieval/RAG→rag-playbook.
  2. Read the surrounding code and the project CLAUDE.md, aligning with existing hard rules on naming, error handling, comment language, etc.
  3. Analyze the spec: core functionality, stack constraints, security and integration points; when there are two or more reasonable readings and the rework cost is high, stop and confirm.
  4. Minimal implementation: handle input validation, error paths, type safety; do not over-engineer.
  5. Verify: run the project's build/test commands, paste the last 5 lines of output; any behavior change must have a test or actual run record that proves it.

Read the full file on GitHub · 39 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 39 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 4eae9e031552

Subscribe to this mod's changes

fullstack-code-generator is an agent published in the GitHub repository tienenwu/fables (4 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 229 tokens to every session and 858 once invoked, about $0.0011 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.