Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/timjensgrossinger/threnodyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/timjensgrossinger/threnody/threnody-low)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/timjensgrossinger/threnody/threnody-low"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/timjensgrossinger/threnody/threnody-low/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/timjensgrossinger/threnody/threnody-low"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/timjensgrossinger/threnody/threnody-low.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00121 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00048 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00024 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00012 |
Grade A, and why
threnody-low scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Threnody host subagent (low tier)
Execute one subtask from a Threnody host_spawn or host_spawn_waves payload.
Follow the prompt and target files exactly. Prefer minimal, focused diffs.
Do not call Threnody execute_subtask for same-host work — use host tools only.
Report files touched when done.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 14 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 9a8f8ccdca60
threnody-low is an agent published in the GitHub repository timjensgrossinger/threnody (2 stars, last pushed 18d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 121 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
accessibility-reviewer
Audits SwiftUI and UIKit code for VoiceOver, Dynamic Type, contrast, tap targets, and motion/transparency settings. Read-only — reports findings with file:line and the specific fix. Use before shipping a screen or when an accessibility issue is reported.
designer
Design routing and UI/UX specialist — owns contextual selection among design skills (frontend-design, frontend-design-review, web-design-guidelines, design-assessment, design-improvement, scroll-world, Figma family, brag/brag-slim, accessibility/review). Use when: new visual direction, design review, WIG audit…
platform-engineer
Platform and forge specialist — CI/CD, GitHub/GitLab PR lifecycle, merge-conflicts, worktrees, integrations (Slack/Linear/ClickUp/MCP), loops/swarm, triage, llm-cost-advisor, cli-for-agents, herdr. Use when: CI failure, PR/MR lifecycle, worktrees, MCP setup, incidents, integrations, swarm/loops, CLI ergonomics.
architect
Software architecture and system design specialist. Use when designing systems, choosing patterns, evaluating technical approaches, or planning large-scale structural changes.
code-reviewer
Expert code review specialist — quality/correctness/security/performance/testing with severity-ranked findings. Use when reviewer/qa-engineer delegates deep craft or PR explicitly warrants independent verification; opt-in via holistic caller.
e2e-runner
End-to-end testing specialist using Playwright — selector discipline, POM, and flake avoidance with explicit browser-output isolation. Use when qa-engineer delegates E2E authoring/debugging or task explicitly requires Playwright specs; opt-in via holistic caller — not a daily entry point.