Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to tlennon-ie/neurodock. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tlennon-ie/neurodock/main/.claude/agents/accessibility-auditor.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tlennon-ie/neurodockWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/tlennon-ie/neurodock/accessibility-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tlennon-ie/neurodock/accessibility-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tlennon-ie/neurodock/accessibility-auditor.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00066 | $0.01563 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00033 | $0.00781 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00313 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00156 |
Grade A, and why
accessibility-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 125 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A f15ddc1bf9da
accessibility-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository tlennon-ie/neurodock (11 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 1,563 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
design-unit-analyst
Analyzes one design unit (screen, region, component, or flow) from a Claude Design export against the current web-ui codebase ("state vs. spec"). Classifies the unit, itemizes visual/behavioral/component-divergence/backend-gap/token-drift changes, maps added UI elements to existing Storybook components or net-new…
style-analyzer
Use this agent after UI implementation or when the user requests design consistency audits. Ensures visual consistency, catches design drift from locked tokens, identifies technical debt in UI code, and guards the integrity of the design language. Context: Multiple UI components were built during the cycle. user…
design-reviewer
Review user-facing changes for Gate 8 — design-system consistency, component states, accessibility, and motion quality.
designer
The Designer of the aSPARK team. Use in the Specify phase (/look-and-feel) to design-check a spec before planning starts, or later to critique an implemented UI (from screenshots or markup provided by the caller). Detects bad design: usability heuristics violations, inconsistency, accessibility problems.
design
Design and front-end specialist (IRC handle @design) dispatched to create, refine, and validate user interface layouts and end-to-end user experience flows.
ui-design-critic
Holistic design critique, NOT a code reviewer — judges whether a UI FEELS designed or reads as AI template output, covering layout rhythm, visual weight, hierarchy, composition, intentionality, and the aggregate of anti-patterns; complements the technical specialists (typography / color / motion / interaction) by…