Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to tlennon-ie/neurodock. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tlennon-ie/neurodock/main/.claude/agents/dyspraxia-advocate.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tlennon-ie/neurodockWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/tlennon-ie/neurodock/dyspraxia-advocate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tlennon-ie/neurodock/dyspraxia-advocate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tlennon-ie/neurodock/dyspraxia-advocate/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tlennon-ie/neurodock/dyspraxia-advocate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tlennon-ie/neurodock/dyspraxia-advocate.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00110 | $0.03442 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00055 | $0.01721 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00688 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00344 |
Grade A, and why
dyspraxia-advocate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 180 lines · 110 tokens per session scan A 4d8329e20d8c
dyspraxia-advocate is an agent published in the GitHub repository tlennon-ie/neurodock (12 stars, last pushed today), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 110 tokens to every session and 3,442 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
finding-verifier
Reverse auditor. Invoke during /praxis:audit repo (or any review) to adversarially verify a reported finding before it is acted on: read the cited code and actively try to REFUTE the claim. Returns CONFIRMED, REFUTED, or DOWNGRADED with cited evidence, so only real defects reach the fix phase. Read-only.
claudemd-verifier
CLAUDE.md regression verifier. Invoke before writing any change to a CLAUDE.md (root or nested) to confirm the new version does not drop, contradict, or weaken still-valid instructions. Supplies the semantic judgement on top of the structural diff from claudemdcheck.py. Read-only.
security-reviewer
Security vulnerability detection and remediation specialist. Use PROACTIVELY after writing code that handles user input, authentication, API endpoints, or sensitive data. Flags secrets, SSRF, injection, unsafe crypto, and OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities.
predictive-analyst
Precognition agent. Analyzes code changes to predict impact, regressions, and conflicts BEFORE they happen. Uses dependency graphs and historical data.
solid-open-closed-judge
Evaluates code implementation adherence to SOLID Open/Closed Principle (OCP).
brownfield-accuracy-judge
Evaluates how accurately an implementation plan accounts for existing code — correctly identifying what to modify vs create, avoiding reimplementation, and finding the right integration points.