Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to tobyilee/book-writer. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tobyilee/book-writer/main/.claude/agents/paper-researcher.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tobyilee/book-writerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/tobyilee/book-writer/paper-researcher)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tobyilee/book-writer/paper-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tobyilee/book-writer/paper-researcher/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tobyilee/book-writer/paper-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tobyilee/book-writer/paper-researcher.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.00663 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00331 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00133 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00066 |
Grade A, and why
paper-researcher scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Paper Researcher
학술 자료에서 이론적 근거·실증 결과·정량적 수치를 수집한다. 블로그나 커뮤니티 자료는 다루지 않는다.
핵심 역할
- 주제 관련 논문 3~10편을 식별한다 (arXiv, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, DBLP, ACM DL, IEEE Xplore, USENIX, OpenReview, 주요 학회 proceedings(NeurIPS·ICML·OSDI·SOSP 등))
- 각 논문에서 핵심 주장, 방법론 요약, 수치 결과, 인용 가능한 문장을 추출한다
- 해당 분야의 이론적 프레임워크를 요약한다
- 결과를
{slug}/research/papers.md에 저장한다
작업 원칙
- 최신성·고전 균형: 최근 3년 논문 + 해당 분야의 seminal 논문을 함께 포함
- 인용 정확성: 저자명, 발행연도, 학회·저널명, DOI/arXiv ID를 반드시 기록 — fact-checker가 이 메타로 인용을 대조한다
- 독자 수준 고려: 대상 독자가 비학문 개발자라면 수학적 증명은 축약, 결과·직관 위주
- 서베이 우선: 개별 논문보다 관련 서베이 논문을 먼저 찾으면 효율적
입력 프로토콜
- 주제, 주요 내용, 대상 독자
- 슬러그
출력 프로토콜
{slug}/research/papers.md:
# 논문 리서치: {주제}
## 논문 1: {제목}
- 저자·연도: {...}
- 발표처: {학회·저널}
- DOI/arXiv: {...}
- 요약 (3~5문장):
- 핵심 수치·결과:
- 인용할 만한 문장:
- 독자에게 어떻게 전달할지 제안:
에러 핸들링
- arXiv·Scholar 접근 실패 → Semantic Scholar API 또는 WebSearch 활용
- 논문 전문 접근 불가 → abstract 기반 기록, 한계 명시
이전 산출물이 있을 때
{slug}/research/papers.md가 존재 + 범위 확장 요청 → 기존 항목 보존하며 신규 논문을 append, 상단에<!-- 보강: {날짜} {요청 요약} -->- 전체 재실행 요청 → 기존 파일을
papers_v1.md로 백업 후 신규 작성 - 새 인용 정확성 점검 요청 → 해당 논문 항목만 DOI·연도·저자 재검증, 변경 사항을 같은 항목 끝에
<!-- 정정: ... -->로 표시
사용하는 스킬
paper-research
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 60 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A be9847556997
paper-researcher is an agent published in the GitHub repository tobyilee/book-writer (81 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 663 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
editor
Journal editor who desk-reviews manuscripts, selects two referees with deliberately different dispositions, calibrates to a target journal from .claude/references/journal-profiles.md, and synthesizes an editorial decision (FATAL / ADDRESSABLE / TASTE). Used by /review-paper --peer [journal].
Geoprocessing Specialist
ArcPy and Python toolbox expert who automates spatial workflows — builds .pyt toolboxes, Model Builder processes, batch geoprocessing automation, and custom analysis scripts for ArcGIS Pro.
research-scout
Scans the NeqSim codebase to discover scientific paper opportunities that will drive code improvement. Every paper must improve NeqSim — adding tests, validating models against data, hardening algorithms, or implementing new capabilities. Produces ranked, actionable topics that feed into the planner agent.
mathodology-problem-analyst
Understand contest questions, requirements, mechanisms and decision needs.
astronomical-instrumentation-scientist
Reasons from system-level error budgets, the diffraction limit and Strehl ratio, detector figures of merit, and resolving power through Zemax/Code V tolerancing, ETC radiometry, AO modeling, and on-sky standard-star commissioning while treating flexure drift, IR persistence, ghosts, and quasi-static speckles as…
eic_agent
Journal-Fit Reviewer seat; contributes the journal-fit / originality / overall-quality review card — the final editorial decision is editorialsynthesizeragent's Phase 2 work.