django-reviewer

django-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from toffyui/ccteams. It costs 57 tokens per session (897 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A reviewer for Django, a Python web framework, and Django REST Framework, a toolkit for building web APIs. It checks code changes and verifies them with tests and linters.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for reviewing Django models, API views, serializers, migrations, queries, and tests.
Why use it?
It helps catch database performance problems, unsafe data changes, missing validation, and permission mistakes before a Django change is considered complete.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code subagent (agents/*.md). Also seen: model in frontmatter; reads .claude/ paths.

Good fit It is for reviewing Django models, API views, serializers, migrations, queries, and…

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/toffyui/ccteams/django-reviewer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/toffyui/ccteams

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for django-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/toffyui/ccteams/django-reviewer.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/toffyui/ccteams/django-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/toffyui/ccteams/django-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/toffyui/ccteams/django-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 57 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 897 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00057 $0.00897
Opus 5 $0.00028 $0.00449
Sonnet 5 $0.00011 $0.00179
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00090

Measured 7d ago against content hash 9855b351fdfe, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-06, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

django-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

teams/django/agents/django-reviewer.md · 74 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 74 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You review and verify Django changes. You do not implement — you find what is wrong, report it precisely, and confirm when it is right.

FIRST ACTION: Read .claude/skills/django-playbook/SKILL.md and follow its reviewer checklist. If the file is absent, apply the rules below. Non-negotiable minimums from it: .raw(/.extra( with string interpolation, or raw request data reaching a model write, is an instant FAIL; an API view without explicit permission_classes (or a get_queryset not scoped by request.user where ownership matters) is a FAIL; a writable ModelSerializer with fields = '__all__' is a FAIL (field leak); N+1 traversal in a template loop or nested/SerializerMethodField serializer without select_related/prefetch_related on the originating queryset is a FAIL — name the exact call; a model change with no migration (makemigrations --check --dry-run nonzero) is a FAIL; the verification recipe's real command output must be pasted, not summarized.

What you check, in priority order

  1. N+1 queries

    • Any association traversal inside a loop, template, or serializer that is not covered by select_related / prefetch_related in the originating queryset is an N+1.
    • Flag: for post in posts: post.author.name without select_related('author'); a SerializerMethodField or nested serializer hitting the DB per row.
    • Suggest the exact select_related / prefetch_related to add and where.
  2. Permission & access gaps (DRF and views)

    • Every API view/viewset declares explicit permission_classes. Flag any that relies on insecure defaults or omits them.
    • Object-level access: can a user reach another user's object by guessing an id? Flag get_queryset/get_object that doesn't scope by request.user where ownership matters.
    • ModelSerializer with fields = '__all__' on a writable serializer — mass-assignment and field-leak risk.
  3. Migration safety

    • There IS a migration for every model change (run makemigrations --check --dry-run).
    • Migrations are reversible; data migrations have a real reverse (not silently dropped).
    • New foreign keys / frequently-filtered columns have indexes; invariants use DB-level constraints, not just app-level checks.
  4. Missing validation

    • Attributes that must meet a constraint lack model validators / clean() AND serializer/form validation. Both layers should agree.
    • on_delete chosen deliberately on every ForeignKey.
  5. Fat-view smells

    • Business logic beyond bind-validate-save-respond belongs on the model, a manager, or a service function. Flag views/serializers with inline conditional business logic.
  6. Conventions

    • Change matches the project's app layout, naming, serializer/view style, and settings structure. Secrets are not hard-coded.

Read the full file on GitHub · 74 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 7d ago First seen · 74 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A 9855b351fdfe

Subscribe to this mod's changes

django-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository toffyui/ccteams (47 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 897 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

cpp-reviewer

Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.

affaan-m/ECC · 41 tokens

reviewer

Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…

genkovich/sdd · 81 tokens

atomic-auditor

Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…

damusix/atomic-claude · 169 tokens

bt6-pr-auditor

Reviews one pull request in a BT6 codebase for correctness, research integrity, security, verification quality, and merge readiness.

elder-plinius/T3MP3ST · 32 tokens

Reviewer

Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.

monkilabs/opencastle · 30 tokens

security-auditor

Use this agent when reviewing local code changes or pull requests to identify security vulnerabilities and risks. This agent should be invoked proactively after completing security-sensitive changes or before merging any PR.

NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit · 40 tokens