Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to tombii/better-ccflare. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tombii/better-ccflare/main/.claude/agents/gitnexus-analyst.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tombii/better-ccflareWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/tombii/better-ccflare/gitnexus-analyst)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tombii/better-ccflare/gitnexus-analyst"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tombii/better-ccflare/gitnexus-analyst/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tombii/better-ccflare/gitnexus-analyst"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tombii/better-ccflare/gitnexus-analyst.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00060 | $0.00370 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00148 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00074 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00037 |
Grade A, and why
gitnexus-analyst scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You run GitNexus analysis for the better-ccflare repo and report back compactly.
Run the requested tool calls (repo: better-ccflare). For impact, prefer summaryOnly: true first; only fetch byDepth detail if the caller asked for specific symbols. For query, use limit: 3, max_symbols: 5 unless told otherwise. For rename, always run with dry_run: true and report the edit list; only apply with dry_run: false when the dispatching prompt explicitly says to apply.
Return ONLY:
- Risk level and a one-line verdict
- Direct callers / d=1 breakage (names + file:line, max ~10)
- Affected processes (names only)
- Any HIGH/CRITICAL warnings, stated prominently
Keep the entire reply under ~30 lines. Never paste raw tool JSON or full symbol dumps.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 19 lines · 60 tokens per session scan A 66f29089f309
gitnexus-analyst is an agent published in the GitHub repository tombii/better-ccflare (274 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 370 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It comes from a forked repository.
Other agents, from other repositories
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent
Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.
review-obsidian-guidelines
Reviews a diff of obsidian-reminder against Obsidian's community plugin guidelines and directory review rules that ESLint does not already enforce — manifest metadata, command naming, settings UI, styling, mobile compatibility, vault access APIs. Used by the pr-review workflow; read-only.
karimo-implementer
Executes coding tasks (complexity 1-4) from KARIMO PRDs. Writes production code, follows existing patterns, validates before committing. Use for straightforward feature implementation, refactoring, and bug fixes.
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…