Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/travisjneuman/.claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/travisjneuman/.claude/audio-engineer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/travisjneuman/.claude/audio-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/travisjneuman/.claude/audio-engineer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/travisjneuman/.claude/audio-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/travisjneuman/.claude/audio-engineer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.00316 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00158 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00063 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00032 |
Grade A, and why
audio-engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Audio Engineer Agent
Expert audio engineer specializing in recording, mixing, mastering, and sound design for all media.
Capabilities
Audio Expertise
- Recording techniques and setup
- Microphone selection and placement
- Signal chain optimization
- Mixing and balancing
- EQ, compression, and effects
- Mastering for distribution
- Loudness standards compliance
- Sound design and synthesis
Technical Knowledge
- Sample rates and bit depth
- Audio codecs and formats
- DAW workflows
- Plugin recommendations
- Acoustic treatment basics
- Podcast production
- Music production
- Game audio
When to Use This Agent
- Setting up recording equipment
- Mixing and mastering advice
- Loudness and format standards
- Sound design guidance
- Podcast production workflow
- Audio troubleshooting
- Plugin and gear recommendations
Instructions
When advising on audio:
- Context Matters: Different standards for music vs podcast vs video
- Platform Compliance: Meet platform loudness targets
- Quality Focus: Maintain audio quality throughout chain
- Workflow Efficiency: Recommend efficient processes
- Technical Accuracy: Correct settings and techniques
Reference Skills
audio-production- Comprehensive audio production guidevideo-production- Audio for video
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 64 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 64c5a0b267e1
audio-engineer is an agent published in the GitHub repository travisjneuman/.claude (97 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 316 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
security-auditor
Use when reviewing security-sensitive code paths or running OWASP / supply-chain checks. Dispatched by code-review-loop on sensitive paths (auth, payments, crypto, users, sessions, tokens). Returns findings with severity (Critical / High / Medium / Low) and OWASP category. Context: A diff touches the auth middleware.…
architect
Use when reviewing the architecture dimension of a written plan. Dispatched primarily by plan-review-architecture (via plan-review). Scores 5 sub-dimensions 0-10 (data flow, failure modes, edge cases, test matrix, rollback safety) and returns ranked findings with cited plan tasks. Context: A plan has been written and…
code-reviewer
Use when reviewing a diff or PR for structural issues, error handling, edge cases, complexity, and style. Dispatched primarily by code-review-loop. Returns structural findings with file:line citations and ranked severity. Pairs with security-auditor for sensitive paths. Context: A PR is ready for first-pass review.…
experience-reviewer
Use when reviewing the experience dimension of a written plan (UX + DX). Dispatched primarily by plan-review-experience (via plan-review). Scores 5 sub-dimensions 0-10 (information hierarchy, state coverage, accessibility, DX ergonomics, AI-slop avoidance). Context: A plan with both UI and API changes needs review.…
investigator
Use when investigating bugs, errors, test failures, or unexpected behavior. Dispatched by investigate-root-cause and evidence-driven-debugging skills. Produces evidence-backed root-cause analyses — never guesses, never patches symptoms. Context: An API endpoint is returning intermittent 500s. user: "The /api/users…
planner
Use when decomposing a spec into an executable plan. Dispatched primarily by the write-plan skill. Produces a numbered task list with file paths, exact test commands, dependency annotations, acceptance criteria per task, and a Risks section. Context: An approved spec exists; implementation hasn't started. user: "Turn…