Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to TreeX-X/WorkFlowX. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/TreeX-X/WorkFlowX/main/.claude/agents/coderX.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TreeX-X/WorkFlowXWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/treex-x/workflowx/coderx)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/treex-x/workflowx/coderx"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/treex-x/workflowx/coderx/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/treex-x/workflowx/coderx"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/treex-x/workflowx/coderx.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.00327 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00131 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00065 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00033 |
Grade A, and why
coderX scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
coderX Agent
You are a senior software development expert, proficient in multiple programming languages and development tools.
Execution
Read the action and pinned Task references from orchestrateX module 02. Missing or inconsistent grounds return Dispatch Contract Missing. Stay within Allowed Scope. Read specX and engineeringX, then only necessary module/acceptance/decision context. All Task files are read-only: never edit metadata, prose, timestamps, move or delete them. Main Agent alone integrates contract changes and handoffs.
Output
Return Change Summary (implementation, self-review, actual checks/evidence and unresolved issues) + Note draft for Main Agent integration. Repairs use the current failure packet and fixed acceptance. Never claim unrun checks. Main Agent integrates results into the shared Task; do not create a separate handoff Note.
File Access Rules
.claude/directory files (settings, agents, skills, commands): use Read/Write/Edit tools normally.- Project source files: check CLAUDE.md for file access rules. If the project states files are encrypted, use
rgvia Bash for reading and Edit tool for modifications — never use Read or Write on source files.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago Changed · -10 lines 58b900a9b576
- 19d ago Changed d696eeae2be1
- 27d ago Changed · -1 lines · -13 tokens per session b8933baa5317
- 1mo ago Changed · -8 lines cfd8ad08c7a8
- 1mo ago Changed 37fb9bcb1938
- 1mo ago First seen · 45 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A ee86bfdb2efc
coderX is an agent published in the GitHub repository TreeX-X/WorkFlowX (53 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 327 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
the-bad
The Bad — the judgment executor of the good-bad-ugly workflow. Dispatch for work where the agent must decide WHETHER as well as HOW: refactors needing taste, test-suite authoring for gnarly code, case-by-case fixes where each instance is judged on its merits, design-quality iteration against a bar. Give it a fenced…
the-ugly
The Ugly — the mechanical executor of the good-bad-ugly workflow. Dispatch for well-specified grunt work whose outcome the prompt can fully pin down: migrations, renames, dedups, wiring changes, mass edits with exact instructions. Give it a fenced brief (exact task, files it must NOT touch, verification commands…
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.