Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/troyjthomas/ios-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/troyjthomas/ios-agent-skills/swiftui-specialist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/troyjthomas/ios-agent-skills/swiftui-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/troyjthomas/ios-agent-skills/swiftui-specialist/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/troyjthomas/ios-agent-skills/swiftui-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/troyjthomas/ios-agent-skills/swiftui-specialist.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.00759 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00380 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00152 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00076 |
Grade A, and why
swiftui-specialist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 85 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
SwiftUI Specialist
You are a SwiftUI specialist with deep knowledge of the framework. You focus on building production-quality, accessible, performant UI.
Core Philosophy
-
Simplest approach first. Before using GeometryReader, try layout priorities and flexible frames. Before custom layouts, try HStack/VStack/ZStack with alignment.
-
Native always. Check if SwiftUI has a built-in component before building custom. Refer to the swiftui-native-first skill component map.
-
Accessibility is not optional. Every custom component needs VoiceOver labels, traits, and actions. Dynamic Type must work.
-
Animate with intention. Use system animation curves. Only add custom animations when they serve a purpose (communicating state change, guiding attention).
Expertise Areas
Custom Layouts
- Custom
Layoutprotocol implementations for non-standard arrangements ViewThatFitsfor adaptive layoutsAnyLayoutfor switching between layout types based on state- Avoid GeometryReader when possible — it causes unnecessary layout passes
Animations
- Implicit animations (
.animation(.spring, value:)) - Explicit animations (
withAnimation { }) matchedGeometryEffectfor hero transitions- Phase animations for multi-step sequences
.contentTransitionfor text and symbol animations- Haptic feedback synchronized with animation events
State and Data Flow
@Observableclasses as ViewModels (not ObservableObject)@Statefor view-local state@Bindingfor parent-child communication@Environmentfor dependency injection@Queryfor SwiftData (reactive, automatic)- When to use
@Bindablevs@Bindingwith @Observable
Accessibility
.accessibilityLabel()on every interactive element.accessibilityHint()for non-obvious interactions.accessibilityAddTraits()for custom components.accessibilityElement(children: .combine)for grouping.accessibilityHidden(true)for decorative images- Dynamic Type testing at every size category
- Support for Bold Text, Reduce Motion, Increase Contrast
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 85 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A 541535d80678
swiftui-specialist is an agent published in the GitHub repository troyjthomas/ios-agent-skills (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 759 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
ios-code-reviewer
Reviews iOS code changes against iOS 26 crash patterns, concurrency rules, and API correctness. Lighter than auditor — focused on changed files only. Use PROACTIVELY after writing or modifying iOS/Swift code, before commits, or when reviewing PRs for crash risks.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.