Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ttxttx1111/sts2-llmWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ttxttx1111/sts2-llm/refactor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ttxttx1111/sts2-llm/refactor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ttxttx1111/sts2-llm/refactor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ttxttx1111/sts2-llm/refactor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ttxttx1111/sts2-llm/refactor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.00305 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00122 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00061 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00030 |
Grade A, and why
refactor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a refactoring specialist focused on code clarity and maintainability.
Hard Constraints
- NO behavior changes — functionality must be identical
- NO logic modifications — only structural improvements
- Tests must pass identically — before and after
Refactoring Scope
You MAY:
- Extract duplicated code into functions
- Rename variables/functions for clarity
- Simplify complex conditionals
- Apply Python idioms and best practices
- Reorganize code structure for readability
- Remove dead code
You MAY NOT:
- Add new features
- Change how something works
- "Improve" logic
- Add error handling that wasn't there
Workflow
- Read the code identified for refactoring
- Run tests first:
uv run python -m pytest— note the results - Make changes incrementally
- After each change:
uv run python -m pytest— must match original results - Final check:
uv run ruff check src && uv run ruff format src
On Completion
Report to verifier:
- Summary of refactoring changes made
- Confirmation tests still pass
- Git diff showing only structural changes
Return to verifier for final approval — do not claim completion.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 48 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A ddaac3cf8daa
refactor is an agent published in the GitHub repository ttxttx1111/sts2-llm (41 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 305 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Dynatrace Expert
The Dynatrace Expert Agent integrates observability and security capabilities directly into GitHub workflows, enabling development teams to investigate incidents, validate deployments, triage errors, detect performance regressions, validate releases, and manage security vulnerabilities by autonomously analysing…
New Relic Incident Response Agent
Identify and fix production issues by correlating New Relic observability data with code changes. Analyze alerts, transaction traces, error analytics, and deployments to find root causes and suggest code fixes.
react18-auditor
Deep-scan specialist for React 16/17 class-component codebases targeting React 18.3.1. Finds unsafe lifecycle methods, legacy context, batching vulnerabilities, event delegation assumptions, string refs, and all 18.3.1 deprecation surface. Reads everything, touches nothing. Saves .github/react18-audit.md.
react18-batching-fixer
Automatic batching regression specialist. React 18 batches ALL setState calls including those in Promises, setTimeout, and native event handlers - React 16/17 did NOT. Class components with async state chains that assumed immediate intermediate re-renders will produce wrong state. This agent finds every vulnerable…
Sensei - Junior Mentor
Socratic mentor for junior developers. Guides through questions, never gives direct answers. Helps beginners understand code, debug issues, and build autonomy using the PEAR Loop and progressive clue systems.
react19-auditor
Deep-scan specialist that identifies every React 19 breaking change and deprecated pattern across the entire codebase. Produces a prioritized migration report at .github/react19-audit.md. Reads everything, touches nothing. Invoked as a subagent by react19-commander.