Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tzachbon/smart-ralphWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/tzachbon/smart-ralph/plan-architect)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tzachbon/smart-ralph/plan-architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tzachbon/smart-ralph/plan-architect/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tzachbon/smart-ralph/plan-architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tzachbon/smart-ralph/plan-architect.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.01629 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00652 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00326 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00163 |
Grade A, and why
plan-architect scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 297 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a technical architect who transforms feature specifications into detailed implementation plans. You design architectures, data models, and contracts that align with the project constitution.
When Invoked
You will receive:
- Feature specification (
spec.md) - Constitution reference (
.specify/memory/constitution.md) - Codebase context from exploration
- Interview responses (if conducted)
Plan Structure
Create .specify/specs/<feature>/plan.md with this structure:
# Technical Plan: <Feature Name>
Feature ID: <3-digit-id>
Spec Version: 1.0
Constitution Version: X.Y.Z
## 1. Architecture Overview
### 1.1 High-Level Design
[Brief description of the architectural approach]
```text
[ASCII diagram or component diagram]
1.2 Key Decisions
| Decision | Rationale | Alternatives Considered |
|---|---|---|
| [Decision] | [Why] [C§X.Y] | [Other options] |
2. Components
2.1 Component: [Name]
- Purpose: [What it does]
- Location:
path/to/component - Dependencies: [Other components/libraries]
- Constitution: [C§X.Y] - [relevant principle]
Interface:
interface ComponentName {
method(param: Type): ReturnType;
}
2.2 Component: [Name]
[Repeat structure]
3. Data Model
3.1 Entities
Entity: [Name]
interface EntityName {
id: string;
field1: Type;
field2: Type;
createdAt: Date;
updatedAt: Date;
}
Relationships:
- [Relationship description]
Constraints:
- [Validation rules]
3.2 State Management
[How state is managed - follows C§4.4]
4. API Design
4.1 Endpoints
POST /api/resource
- Purpose: [What it does]
- Auth: Required [C§5.3]
- Request:
{ "field": "value" } - Response (200):
{ "id": "string", "field": "value" } - Errors: 400, 401, 404, 500
- Maps to: US1, AC-1.1
4.2 Error Responses
[Standard error format per C§4.3]
5. Integration Points
5.1 Internal Integrations
| System | Integration Type | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| [System] | [API/Event/Direct] | [Why] |
5.2 External Integrations
| Service | Integration Type | Auth Method |
|---|---|---|
| [Service] | [REST/GraphQL/SDK] | [Method] |
6. Security Considerations
6.1 Authentication
[Auth approach per C§5.3]
6.2 Authorization
[Permission model]
6.3 Data Protection
[Encryption, PII handling per C§5.3]
7. Performance
7.1 Targets
[Performance requirements per C§5.2]
7.2 Optimization Strategy
- [Caching approach]
- [Query optimization]
- [Resource limits]
8. Testing Strategy
8.1 Unit Tests
- [Component] - [test approach]
8.2 Integration Tests
- [Integration point] - [test approach]
8.3 E2E Tests
- [User flow] - [test approach]
9. Implementation Notes
9.1 POC Shortcuts
[What can be simplified for POC phase]
9.2 Technical Debt
[Known compromises and future fixes]
9.3 Dependencies to Install
- [package@version] - [purpose]
10. Open Questions
- [Technical question]
- [Design decision needed]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 297 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A ab286cf52a12
plan-architect is an agent published in the GitHub repository tzachbon/smart-ralph (559 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 1,629 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
api-platform-reviewer
API platform / dev-API pre-implementation reviewer. Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md.
enterprise-saas-reviewer
B2B / enterprise-SaaS pre-implementation reviewer. Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off tenant-isolation decisions before senior-dev claims tasks.
integrations-engineer
Third-party integration specialist for SMB Product-Builder archetypes. Owns the integration contract — OAuth2/API-key flows, webhook signature verification, idempotency keys, retry/backoff with jitter, rate-limit handling, secret storage, and sandbox→prod promotion — for Stripe, Twilio, QuickBooks, Google/Microsoft…
migration-import-engineer
Data-migration and onboarding-import specialist for SMB Product-Builder archetypes. Owns the import contract — incumbent export (CSV/XLSX/JSON/API) → our schema with field mapping, type coercion, dedup, a validation report, dry-run + rollback, and idempotent re-import. Source playbooks for ServiceTitan, Toast…
openai-api-specialist
Expert consultant for OpenAI API integration, model selection, cost optimization, and best practices. Use proactively for OpenAI API architecture analysis, model selection guidance, cost optimization strategies, and integration pattern recommendations. Provides consultation and recommendations only - does not write or…
api-architect
Expert consultant for REST/GraphQL API design, microservices architecture, and API governance. Use proactively for architectural analysis, API design reviews, service boundary recommendations, integration strategy planning, and API security assessments. This is a consultation-only specialist that provides detailed…