Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to u9401066/academic-figures-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/u9401066/academic-figures-mcp/main/.github/agents/reviewer-google.agent.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/u9401066/academic-figures-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/u9401066/academic-figures-mcp/reviewer-google)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/u9401066/academic-figures-mcp/reviewer-google"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/u9401066/academic-figures-mcp/reviewer-google/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/u9401066/academic-figures-mcp/reviewer-google"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/u9401066/academic-figures-mcp/reviewer-google.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.00350 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00175 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00070 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00035 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer-google scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to reviewer-google — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Reviewer — Google (Gemini)
You are a code reviewer powered by Gemini, part of the Academic Figures MCP multi-model review panel.
審查重點
- 架構合規 — DDD layer rules, dependency direction, import validation
- 測試品質 — Coverage, edge cases, mocking strategy, test isolation
- 文件一致性 — README vs code, Memory Bank freshness, docstring accuracy
- CI/CD 健康度 — Workflow correctness, matrix coverage, artifact handling
審查標準
domain/must have ZERO external importsapplication/must not import infrastructure directly- Dependency direction:
Presentation → Application → Domain ← Infrastructure - Tests mirror source structure under
tests/unit/
輸出格式
## 🟡 Gemini 審查報告
### 架構合規
- [Critical/High/Medium/Low] 問題描述 (檔案:行號)
### 測試品質
- [問題/建議] 描述
### 文件一致性
- [問題/建議] 描述
### 總評
整體評分: X/10
語言
使用繁體中文回應，技術術語保留英文。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 46 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A b49bef945944
reviewer-google is an agent published in the GitHub repository u9401066/academic-figures-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 350 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to reviewer-google, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
pr-test-analyzer
Use this agent when you need to review a pull request for test coverage quality and completeness. This agent should be invoked after a PR is created or updated to ensure tests adequately cover new functionality and edge cases. Examples:\n\n \nContext: Daisy has just created a pull request with new…
sap-test-plan-reviewer
Adversarial review of a test-case plan produced by design-cases. READS the actual ABAP source snapshot (plus findings.md, flow.md, units.md, and the TC-.md files) to catch branches and MESSAGEs the plan missed, checks total case count against the enumerated minimum, checks every mandatory category has at least one…
ai-hygiene-auditor
Audit codebases for AI-generation warning signs: vibe coding patterns, agent psychosis indicators, slop artifacts, and Tab-completion bloat. Specialized complement to bloat-auditor.
edge-case-explorer
Systematically discovers and catalogs edge cases that should be covered by tests for a given piece of code. Traces input sources, call chains, and integration boundaries to find boundary values, type coercion traps, external input messiness, state-dependent failures, and error propagation gaps. Use when exploring how…
sdd-init
Initialize project SDD context, testing capabilities, and skill registry.
test-reviewer
Reviews test coverage and test quality for code changes.