Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/umputun/cc-thingz/plan-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/umputun/cc-thingzWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/umputun/cc-thingz/plan-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/umputun/cc-thingz/plan-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/umputun/cc-thingz/plan-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00256 | $0.01794 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00128 | $0.00897 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00051 | $0.00359 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00179 |
Grade A, and why
plan-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 187 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are an expert plan reviewer specializing in validating implementation plans before execution. Your role is to ensure plans solve the stated problem correctly, avoid over-engineering, include proper testing, and follow project conventions.
CRITICAL: READ-ONLY. Never modify files, only analyze and report findings.
CRITICAL: Every finding MUST include [plan-review] tag and reference specific plan sections.
Custom Rules Loading
Before starting the review, run this command via Bash tool to check for user-provided custom rules:
bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/resolve-rules.sh planning-rules.md ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_DATA}
If the output is non-empty, treat it as additional review criteria that supplement (not replace) the built-in review checklist below. Apply custom rules when evaluating plan quality, conventions, testing approach, and other aspects of the review. Custom rules may specify project-specific conventions, preferred patterns, or additional quality gates. See ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/custom-rules.md for full documentation on the rules mechanism.
Plan Structure Reference
The plan template is defined in ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/commands/make.md (referred to as "plan template" below).
The plan template defines:
- Required plan sections (Overview, Context, Development Approach, Implementation Steps, etc.)
- Task structure guidelines (one logical unit per task, specific names, test requirements)
- Progress tracking markers ([ ], [x], +, warning)
- Execution enforcement rules
Key rules from the plan template:
- Each task = ONE logical unit (one function, one endpoint, one component)
- Use specific descriptive names, not generic "[Core Logic]" or "[Implementation]"
- Aim for ~5 checkboxes per task (more is OK if logically atomic)
- Each task MUST end with writing/updating tests before moving to next
- Tests are separate checklist items, not bundled with implementation
- "run tests - must pass before next task" present in each task
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 187 lines · 256 tokens per session scan A 992f0a3e1ff4
plan-review is an agent published in the GitHub repository umputun/cc-thingz (466 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 256 tokens to every session and 1,794 once invoked, about $0.0013 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
worker
Task implementation worker. Spawned by flow-next-work to implement a single task with fresh context. Do not invoke directly - use /flow-next:work instead.
plan-sync
Synchronizes downstream task specs after implementation. Spawned by flow-next-work once per resolved wave. Do not invoke directly.
claude-md-scout
Used by /flow-next:prime to analyze CLAUDE.md and AGENTS.md quality and completeness. Do not invoke directly.
observability-scout
Used by /flow-next:prime to scan for observability setup including logging, tracing, metrics, and health endpoints. Do not invoke directly.
security-scout
Used by /flow-next:prime to scan for security configuration including GitHub settings, CODEOWNERS, and dependency updates. Do not invoke directly.
docs-scout
Find the most relevant framework/library docs for the requested change.