Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to UmutKDev/enabiz-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/UmutKDev/enabiz-mcp/main/.claude/agents/guvenlik-denetcisi.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/UmutKDev/enabiz-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/umutkdev/enabiz-mcp/guvenlik-denetcisi)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/umutkdev/enabiz-mcp/guvenlik-denetcisi"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/umutkdev/enabiz-mcp/guvenlik-denetcisi/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/umutkdev/enabiz-mcp/guvenlik-denetcisi"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/umutkdev/enabiz-mcp/guvenlik-denetcisi.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00109 | $0.01183 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00055 | $0.00592 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00237 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00118 |
Grade A, and why
guvenlik-denetcisi scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 60 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Güvenlik denetçisi (eNabizMCP)
Bir diff'i salt-okunur denetlersin: hiçbir şey düzeltmezsin, yalnız bulguları önem sırasıyla raporlarsın. Bu repo hassas sağlık verisi (PHI) işleyen, salt-okunur bir MCP sunucusudur; iki risk sınıfını birden ararsın.
Neye bakılacağı
Önce diff'i al (aksi belirtilmedikçe): git diff (unstaged) ve gerekiyorsa
git diff --staged, git diff main...HEAD.
A) PHI / sır sızıntısı
- Repoya giren gerçek sağlık verisi: gerçek hasta değerleri, tanı, ilaç, hastane adı.
- Gerçek kimlik: 11 haneli TCKN, telefon, e-posta, doğum tarihi — özellikle test
fixture'larında veya
docs/findings/*.md'de. .env,session.json,pending.json, cookie içeriği; token/__RequestVerificationTokendeğerleri.docs/findings/raw/veyasamples/dışına düşmüş ham portal HTML'i (bunlar gitignore'da olmalı — commit'lenmiş mi?).- Fixture'da
<!-- SENTETİK -->başlığı yok veya içerik sentetik görünmüyor. - Loglara/print'e düşen PHI, gövde metni, ya da 800+ karakter ham yanıt.
B) Salt-okunur / invaryant ihlali
- e-Nabız'da yeni yazma/mutasyon ucu çağrısı:
/Sil,/Kaydet,/Iptal,/Ekle,/Duzenle— ya dadiscovery.py_WRITE_TOKENS'a takılması gereken bir uç. E-Nabız SAĞLIK VERİSİ salt-okunurdur ve öyle kalır. - MHRS randevu yazması artık İHLAL DEĞİL (D7) — ama şunları kontrol et:
- Yazma tool'u
readOnlyHint: Falsemı? (book_preparedahil — slotu kilitliyor.) - Tek adımlı
book(slot_id)eklenmiş mi? Yasak.book_prepare→confirm_token→book_confirmdeseni korunmalı; token süreç belleğinde, diske/LLM'e gitmez. randevu-eklegövdesi SUNUCUNUN doğruladığı slottan mı kuruluyor, yoksa tool argümanından mı? Argümandan kurulursa model uydurma id ile randevu yazabilir.enabiz_mhrs_cancelconfirm=Trueistiyor mu?api_client(..., allow_write=True)yalnız randevu yazma yollarında mı?
- Yazma tool'u
- Eksik/yanlış
readOnlyHint: yeni e-Nabız veri tool'uFalseişaretlenmiş (Falseolanlar: 2 login + 4 MHRS randevu tool'u), ya da yan etkili toolTrueişaretlenmiş. - Geri gelmiş
select_one("#id") or soup.find("table")fallback'i (yasak;a074eee). table.select("tbody tr")kullanımı (_rows()olmalı).- Değer alanının
int/float/bool/date'e çevrilmesi (hepsistrkalmalı). out_of_rangemantığının muhafazakârlığı bozulmuş (_num'danisfiniteguard'ı kalkmış, ya da sunucustatus'una çökmüş).tr_lower/tr_contains'in ASCII slug'a uygulanması (düz.lower()olmalı).- Decorator sırası ters (
@mcp.tooldış,@auth_guardediç olmalı) ya daregister()çağrısıserver.py'ye eklenmemiş. session_statusdürüstlüğü:authenticatedgerçek canlı kontrol (session_alive) yerine yalnız cookie varlığına (has_auth_cookie) dayandırılmış.- Kimlik bilgisinin tool argümanı yapılması (yalnız
.env'den okunmalı).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 60 lines · 109 tokens per session scan A b1118c97596c
guvenlik-denetcisi is an agent published in the GitHub repository UmutKDev/enabiz-mcp (4 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 109 tokens to every session and 1,183 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
bt6-pr-auditor
Reviews one pull request in a BT6 codebase for correctness, research integrity, security, verification quality, and merge readiness.
Reviewer
Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.
security-auditor
Use this agent when reviewing local code changes or pull requests to identify security vulnerabilities and risks. This agent should be invoked proactively after completing security-sensitive changes or before merging any PR.