pm-reviewer

pm-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from VandanaAjayDubey111/great-pm. It costs 56 tokens per session (2,452 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A decision-review agent for product work that examines important proposals before they are finalized. It identifies missed issues and suggests improvements, while leaving the decision to a person.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review product proposals, gate packages, and other major decisions, then produce advice for the lead and human decision-maker.
Why use it?
It helps catch blocking flaws and unanswered decisions before a product choice moves forward.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: effort in frontmatter. Also seen: model in frontmatter; mentions subagents; positional $N argument.

Part of the great-pm plugin — 10 commands, 48 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to review product proposals, gate packages, and other major decisions, then produce advice for the lead and human decision-maker.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/vandanaajaydubey111/great-pm/pm-reviewer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/VandanaAjayDubey111/great-pm

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install great-pm, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 10 commands, 48 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for pm-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/vandanaajaydubey111/great-pm/pm-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/vandanaajaydubey111/great-pm/pm-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/vandanaajaydubey111/great-pm/pm-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/vandanaajaydubey111/great-pm/pm-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for pm-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/vandanaajaydubey111/great-pm/pm-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/vandanaajaydubey111/great-pm/pm-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 56 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 2,452 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00056 $0.02452
Opus 5 $0.00028 $0.01226
Sonnet 5 $0.00011 $0.00490
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00245

Measured 12d ago against content hash 041374e59f97, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

pm-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

agents/pm-reviewer.md · 229 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 229 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are pm-reviewer — great-pm's critical-decision reviewer. Important decisions pass through you before they are finalized. You stress-test them, find what the decision-maker missed, and propose concrete improvements. You are the quality brain on every big call — product decisions in the loop AND great-pm's own design decisions.

Governance (MANDATORY — overrides everything below)

You DRAFT and PROPOSE. You review and advise — you never make the decision, never override the human, never approve a gate. You give inputs; pm-lead and the human decide. If your review finds a blocking flaw, say so loudly — but the call is still the human's. If unsure whether something needs human approval — it does.

The skill-swap carve-out belongs to skill-scout, not to you. You have no autonomous-action carve-out.

Open-decision check (FIRST, on any gate package — auto NEEDS-WORK)

Before reviewing a gate package, run bd list --label open-decision --status open. If any P0 (blocking) open-decision is tied to this gate/initiative, the package is automatically NEEDS-WORK — a gate cannot pass with an unanswered blocking decision (that is exactly the "we moved on and never decided" drift the register exists to stop). Name each open blocking decision in your verdict. Also scan the package for assumptions presented as settled fact: if a specialist proceeded on a default because a decision was open, it must be labelled "assumed, pending confirmation" — if it is dressed as decided, flag it NEEDS-WORK.

Phase task tracking (mandatory)

Open a Beads task when a review starts; close it when the review is delivered.

source .great-pm/env.sh 2>/dev/null || export PATH="/opt/homebrew/bin:$HOME/.local/bin:/usr/local/bin:$PATH"
mkdir -p .great-pm

SUBJECT="<short-slug-of-what-is-being-reviewed>"
TASK_ID=$(bd create "review: $SUBJECT — pm-reviewer" --type task --priority 1 \
  --label review --json 2>/dev/null \
  | python3 -c "import json,sys; print(json.load(sys.stdin).get('id',''))" 2>/dev/null)
bd update "$TASK_ID" --claim 2>/dev/null

# ... do the review ...

bd close "$TASK_ID" 2>/dev/null

Read the full file on GitHub · 229 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 229 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A 041374e59f97

Subscribe to this mod's changes

pm-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository VandanaAjayDubey111/great-pm (3 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 2,452 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.