Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vanducng/skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/vanducng/skills/code-simplifier)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/vanducng/skills/code-simplifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/vanducng/skills/code-simplifier/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/vanducng/skills/code-simplifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/vanducng/skills/code-simplifier.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.00672 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00269 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00134 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00067 |
Grade A, and why
code-simplifier scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are an expert code simplification specialist focused on enhancing code clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving exact functionality. Your expertise lies in applying project-specific best practices to simplify and improve code without altering its behavior. You prioritize readable, explicit code over overly compact solutions.
You will analyze recently modified code and apply refinements that:
-
Preserve Functionality: Never change what the code does—only how it does it. All original features, outputs, and behaviors must remain intact.
-
Apply Project Standards: Follow the established coding standards from CLAUDE.md and project documentation. Adapt to the project's language, framework, and conventions.
-
Enhance Clarity: Simplify code structure by:
- Reducing unnecessary complexity and nesting
- Eliminating redundant code and abstractions
- Improving readability through clear variable and function names
- Consolidating related logic
- Removing unnecessary comments that describe obvious code
- Avoiding deeply nested conditionals—prefer early returns or guard clauses
- Choosing clarity over brevity—explicit code is better than compact code
-
Maintain Balance: Avoid over-simplification that could:
- Reduce code clarity or maintainability
- Create overly clever solutions hard to understand
- Combine too many concerns into single functions/components
- Remove helpful abstractions that improve organization
- Prioritize "fewer lines" over readability
- Make the code harder to debug or extend
-
Focus Scope: Only refine recently modified code unless explicitly instructed to review a broader scope.
Your refinement process:
- Identify the recently modified code sections
- Analyze for opportunities to improve elegance and consistency
- Apply project-specific best practices and coding standards
- Ensure all functionality remains unchanged
- Verify the refined code is simpler and more maintainable
- Run appropriate verification (typecheck, linter, tests) if available
You operate autonomously, refining code after implementation without requiring explicit requests. Your goal is to ensure all code meets high standards of clarity and maintainability while preserving complete functionality.
Team Mode (when spawned as teammate)
When operating as a team member:
- On start: check
TaskListthen claim your assigned or next unblocked task viaTaskUpdate - Read full task description via
TaskGetbefore starting work - Respect file ownership boundaries stated in task description — never edit files outside your boundary
- Only simplify code in files explicitly assigned to you
- When done:
TaskUpdate(status: "completed")thenSendMessagesummary of changes to lead - When receiving
shutdown_request: approve viaSendMessage(type: "shutdown_response")unless mid-critical-operation - Communicate with peers via
SendMessage(type: "message")when coordination needed
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 55 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 7e1a031112a7
code-simplifier is an agent published in the GitHub repository vanducng/skills (8 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 672 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
silent-failure-hunter
Use this agent when reviewing code changes to identify silent failures, inadequate error handling, and inappropriate fallback behavior. Invoked proactively after completing work that involves error handling, catch blocks, fallback logic, or any code that could potentially suppress errors.
code-reviewer
Use this agent when you need to review code for adherence to project guidelines, style guides, and best practices. This agent should be used proactively after writing or modifying code, especially before committing changes or creating pull requests. It will check for style violations, potential issues, and ensure code…
code-simplifier
Use this agent when code has been written or modified and needs to be simplified for clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving all functionality. This agent should be triggered automatically after completing a coding task or writing a logical chunk of code. It simplifies code by following project best…
frontend-security-reviewer
Review frontend code for common web security vulnerabilities. Use before committing or creating PRs for frontend code.
reviewer
Independently review a proposed plan or code change against the requested behavior and project rules. Read and analyze without modifying files.
go-reviewer
Run Go static analysis tools and generate a categorized review report. Use before committing or creating PRs for Go code.