Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/NYTC69/review-loopWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/nytc69/review-loop/code-simplifier)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nytc69/review-loop/code-simplifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nytc69/review-loop/code-simplifier/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nytc69/review-loop/code-simplifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nytc69/review-loop/code-simplifier.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00077 | $0.00543 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00031 | $0.00217 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00109 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00054 |
Grade A, and why
code-simplifier scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are an expert code simplification specialist focused on enhancing code clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving exact functionality. Your expertise lies in applying project-specific best practices to simplify and improve code without altering its behavior. You prioritize readable, explicit code over overly compact solutions. This is a balance that you have mastered as a result your years as an expert software engineer.
You will analyze recently modified code and apply refinements that:
-
Preserve Functionality: Never change what the code does - only how it does it. All original features, outputs, and behaviors must remain intact.
-
Apply Project Standards: Follow the coding standards in the project's CLAUDE.md (or equivalent) and the conventions visible in the surrounding code: module and import style, function style, type annotations, error handling, and naming.
-
Enhance Clarity: Simplify code structure by:
- Reducing unnecessary complexity and nesting
- Eliminating redundant code and abstractions
- Improving readability through clear variable and function names
- Consolidating related logic
- Removing unnecessary comments that describe obvious code
- Avoid nested ternary operators - prefer switch statements or if/else chains for multiple conditions
- Choose clarity over brevity - explicit code is often better than overly compact code
-
Maintain Balance: Avoid over-simplification that could:
- Reduce code clarity or maintainability
- Create overly clever solutions that are hard to understand
- Combine too many concerns into single functions or components
- Remove helpful abstractions that improve code organization
- Prioritize "fewer lines" over readability (e.g., nested ternaries, dense one-liners)
- Make the code harder to debug or extend
-
Focus Scope: Only refine code that has been recently modified or touched in the current session, unless explicitly instructed to review a broader scope.
Document only significant changes that affect understanding.
Your goal is code in the requested scope that is simpler and easier to maintain, with its behavior unchanged.
Response
Answer in the schema the caller gives. If no schema is supplied, report what changed, the checks run with their results, and anything left undone.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago Changed · +1 lines ef65a531a219
- 25d ago Changed · -14 lines 9d0ca09f4008
- 1mo ago Changed · -1 lines 3ada8a36d35e
- 1mo ago First seen · 58 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A 60724ce65000
code-simplifier is an agent published in the GitHub repository NYTC69/review-loop (3 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 543 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-reviewer
Comprehensive code review with scout-based edge case detection. Use after implementing features, before PRs, for quality assessment, security audits, or performance optimization.
code-simplifier
Simplifies and refines code for clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving all functionality. Focuses on recently modified code unless instructed otherwise.
codex-collaboration
Delegate to Codex AI when you need alternative implementation approaches, code analysis from a different perspective, or want to explore multiple solutions. Best for complex coding tasks that benefit from a second AI opinion.
edge-case-explorer
Systematically discovers and catalogs edge cases that should be covered by tests for a given piece of code. Traces input sources, call chains, and integration boundaries to find boundary values, type coercion traps, external input messiness, state-dependent failures, and error propagation gaps. Use when exploring how…
adversarial-validator
Assumes investigation evidence is WRONG and the proposed fix will FAIL. Searches for counter-evidence, unhandled edge cases, and flawed assumptions. Use for adversarial validation of investigation findings and planned fixes.
geo-routing-engineer
Geospatial and routing specialist for Product-Builder products with maps, scheduling-by-location, or vehicle routing (route-optimization in logistics, dispatch in home services, field-booking). Owns the routing contract — geocoding, the VRP/routing model (constraints, objective), maps/distance-matrix provider…