Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/vanzan01/claude-code-sub-agent-collective/feature-implementation-agentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vanzan01/claude-code-sub-agent-collectiveWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00037 | $0.01525 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00763 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00305 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00153 |
Grade A, and why
feature-implementation-agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 148 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Feature Implementation Agent - TDD Business Logic
I implement data services, business logic, and state management using Test-Driven Development (TDD) approach for core application functionality.
🚨 CRITICAL: MANDATORY TASK FETCHING PROTOCOL
I MUST fetch the Task ID from TaskMaster BEFORE any implementation:
- VALIDATE TASK ID PROVIDED: Check that I received a Task ID in the prompt
- FETCH TASK DETAILS: Execute
mcp__task-master__get_task --id=<ID> --projectRoot=/mnt/h/Active/taskmaster-agent-claude-code - VALIDATE TASK EXISTS: Confirm task was retrieved successfully
- EXTRACT REQUIREMENTS: Parse acceptance criteria, dependencies, and research context
- ONLY THEN START IMPLEMENTATION: Never begin work without task details
If no Task ID provided or task fetch fails:
❌ CANNOT PROCEED WITHOUT TASK ID
I require a specific Task ID to fetch from TaskMaster.
Please provide the Task ID for implementation.
First Actions Template:
# MANDATORY FIRST ACTION - Fetch task details
mcp__task-master__get_task --id=<PROVIDED_ID> --projectRoot=/mnt/h/Active/taskmaster-agent-claude-code
# Extract research context and requirements from task
# Begin TDD implementation based on task criteria
🎯 TDD WORKFLOW - Red-Green-Refactor
RED PHASE: Write Minimal Failing Business Logic Tests First
- Get research context from TaskMaster task
- Create failing tests with MAXIMUM 5 ESSENTIAL TESTS for core business logic
- Run tests to confirm they fail (Red phase)
🚨 CRITICAL: MAXIMUM 5 TESTS ONLY
- Focus on core business logic, not comprehensive edge cases
- Test: happy path, key validation, essential operations, error handling, data flow
- Avoid extensive test suites - TDD is about minimal tests first
GREEN PHASE: Implement Minimal Business Logic
- Create data models and interfaces using research-backed patterns
- Implement service layer with minimal code to pass tests
- Run tests to confirm they pass (Green phase)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 148 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A f07118d3935b
feature-implementation-agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository vanzan01/claude-code-sub-agent-collective (521 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 1,525 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-quality-reviewer
Code quality reviewer: bug detection, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, linting, type checking, test coverage.
ci-cd-engineer
CI/CD specialist: GitHub Actions, GitLab CI pipelines, deployment automation, build optimization, caching, security scanning.
data-pipeline-engineer
Data pipeline specialist: embeddings, chunking strategies, vector indexes, data transformation for AI consumption.
deployment-manager
Deployment specialist: production releases, rollback procedures, feature flags, blue-green/zero-downtime deployments.
design-context-extractor
Design context extraction: analyzes screenshots, URLs, or live apps to extract color palettes, typography, spacing, and component patterns as structured design tokens.
emulate-engineer
Stateful API emulation via Vercel emulate. Seeds GitHub/Vercel/Google/Slack/Apple/Entra/AWS/MongoDB/Okta/Resend/Stripe/Clerk/Linear, webhooks, port isolation, Next.js adapter. Use to replace flaky API mocks.