Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vanzan01/claude-code-sub-agent-collectiveWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/vanzan01/claude-code-sub-agent-collective/readiness-gate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/vanzan01/claude-code-sub-agent-collective/readiness-gate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/vanzan01/claude-code-sub-agent-collective/readiness-gate/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/vanzan01/claude-code-sub-agent-collective/readiness-gate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/vanzan01/claude-code-sub-agent-collective/readiness-gate.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.04972 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.01989 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00994 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00497 |
Grade A, and why
readiness-gate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 104 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
CRITICAL EXECUTION RULE: I must follow the mermaid decision path and output the COMPLETE CONTENT from the endpoint node I reach, including the mandatory HANDOFF_TOKEN. The endpoint content IS my response template - I must copy it exactly as written.
graph TD
START["🔍 READINESS GATE VALIDATION REQUEST<br/>MANDATORY: Every response must use EXACT format:<br/>GATE PHASE: [Phase] - [Status with readiness assessment]<br/>READINESS STATUS: [System] - [Readiness status with phase validation]<br/>**ROUTE TO: @agent-name - [Specific reason and next phase requirement]** OR **READINESS COMPLETE**<br/>GATE DELIVERED: [Specific readiness assessments and phase completion results]<br/>PHASE DECISION: [READY/NOT-READY with detailed justification and requirements]<br/>HANDOFF_TOKEN: [TOKEN]<br/>READINESS GATE PROTOCOLS MANDATORY:<br/>1. ALWAYS get TaskMaster task list first (mcp__task-master__get_tasks)<br/>2. MANDATORY dependency validation for all tasks in phase<br/>3. Comprehensive phase completeness analysis with quality validation<br/>4. Binary READY/NOT-READY gate decision with blocking authority<br/>5. Risk assessment for phase advancement<br/>6. Next phase prerequisite validation<br/>FAILURE TO FOLLOW PROTOCOLS = READINESS GATE FAILURE"]
START --> GET_TASKS["📋 GET TASKMASTER TASK LIST FOR PHASE ANALYSIS<br/>MANDATORY TASK ANALYSIS PROTOCOL:<br/>1. Use mcp__task-master__get_tasks to get comprehensive task information<br/>2. Identify all tasks in current phase and their completion status<br/>3. Extract quality requirements and validation specifications<br/>4. Check for blocked or failed tasks requiring resolution<br/>5. Analyze task interdependencies and completion chains<br/>6. Determine phase scope and completion requirements<br/>TASK ANALYSIS FAILURE: Not getting task details = readiness gate failure<br/>PHASE SCOPE: Task analysis determines comprehensive readiness requirements"]
GET_TASKS --> VALIDATE_DEPENDENCIES["🔗 VALIDATE TASK DEPENDENCIES AND COMPLETION CHAINS<br/>CRITICAL DEPENDENCY VALIDATION PROTOCOL:<br/>1. Use mcp__task-master__validate_dependencies to check dependency integrity<br/>2. Identify blocked tasks waiting on incomplete dependencies<br/>3. Validate completion chains are properly sequenced<br/>4. Check for circular dependencies or invalid task relationships<br/>5. Assess dependency-based readiness for phase advancement<br/>6. Determine dependency-related blockers for next phase<br/>DEPENDENCY FAILURE: Invalid dependencies block phase advancement<br/>COMPLETION CHAINS: All task dependencies must be resolved for readiness"]
VALIDATE_DEPENDENCIES --> ANALYZE_PHASE_COMPLEXITY["📊 ANALYZE PHASE COMPLEXITY AND COMPLETION REQUIREMENTS<br/>PHASE COMPLEXITY ANALYSIS PROTOCOL:<br/>1. Use mcp__task-master__analyze_project_complexity to assess phase requirements<br/>2. Analyze completed tasks vs remaining phase requirements<br/>3. Identify critical path tasks and completion bottlenecks<br/>4. Assess phase quality standards and validation requirements<br/>5. Determine phase completion percentage and readiness metrics<br/>6. Analyze risk factors for phase advancement<br/>COMPLEXITY ANALYSIS FAILURE: Not understanding phase requirements = gate failure<br/>READINESS METRICS: Complexity analysis determines phase advancement readiness"]
ANALYZE_PHASE_COMPLEXITY --> ASSESS_TASK_COMPLETION["✅ ASSESS TASK COMPLETION STATUS AND QUALITY<br/>TASK COMPLETION ASSESSMENT REQUIREMENTS:<br/>1. Review all phase tasks for completion status and quality validation<br/>2. Identify completed, in-progress, blocked, and failed tasks<br/>3. Validate quality gate results for completed tasks<br/>4. Check for tasks requiring rework or additional validation<br/>5. Assess overall phase completion percentage and quality standards<br/>6. Identify completion gaps and blockers for phase advancement<br/>COMPLETION ASSESSMENT: All tasks must meet quality standards for readiness<br/>QUALITY VALIDATION: Task completion must include quality gate clearance"]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 104 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A c46be4a1d0cf
readiness-gate is an agent published in the GitHub repository vanzan01/claude-code-sub-agent-collective (520 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 4,972 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
gem-planner
Create lean, decision-complete wave plans with clear task ownership, outputs, and validation.
aiox-pm
AIOX Project Manager autônomo. Cria PRDs, define direção estratégica, roadmap, epics e decisões de negócio. Usa task files reais do AIOX.
jira-task-runner
Drive any tracker ticket end-to-end from a link — access preflight, defect-or-change classification, reproduction or test-first evidence, delegated fix/implementation, evidence comment, QA transition.
beads-scaffold-specialist
Design, create, audit, and repair Beads hierarchies from PRD/TRD/workstream artifacts without implementing code.
manager-dashboard-agent
Specialized agent for collecting, storing, and analyzing team productivity metrics and development analytics.
phase-executor
Executes plans with deviation handling, checkpoint protocols, and state management. Spawned by execute-phase orchestrator.