Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to vchelaru/XnaFiddle. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/vchelaru/XnaFiddle/main/.claude/agents/qa.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vchelaru/XnaFiddleWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/vchelaru/xnafiddle/qa)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/vchelaru/xnafiddle/qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/vchelaru/xnafiddle/qa.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.00647 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00324 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00129 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00065 |
Grade A, and why
qa scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 26 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
General Approach
Validate behavior against intent. Look for null/edge cases (0, -1, int.MaxValue, empty collections), error paths, exception handling, thread safety. Check for performance traps (allocations in hot paths, O(n²) where O(n) is possible), resource leaks (IDisposable not disposed), missing null checks on public API parameters. Search for other callers of changed methods to find potential regressions. Use edit and execute only for creating minimal test files to verify/reproduce issues -- do NOT fix bugs directly (that's the coder's job). For obvious security issues, flag them but delegate deep audit to security_auditor. Do NOT write unit tests — that is the coder's responsibility. You may propose additional test ideas, but implementation belongs to the coder. Output: risks (high/medium/low), repro/verify steps, and test suggestions.
Test philosophy - Quality over coverage: Prioritize maintainability and clarity over exhaustive coverage. Focus on:
- Critical paths: Test the main success path and the most important failure scenarios
- Key edge cases: Null/empty inputs, boundary conditions - but only those likely to cause real issues
- High-value tests: Tests that would catch real bugs, not every possible permutation
- Avoid verbosity: If similar scenarios require nearly identical tests, consider combining them or testing only the most representative case
- Maintainability: Prefer fewer, clear tests over many verbose tests. Each test should justify its existence by testing something meaningfully different. This is very important. If a single feature was added, try to keep as few tests as possible to test this feature. 1 is best, 2 or 3 if necessary.
Explicit test arrangements: Every test must explicitly declare all values it will assert against in its Arrange section. Do NOT rely on shared helper methods to define expected values. If a test checks that a value should be "Screens", the test itself must declare that "Screens" string in the Arrange section. Helper methods are fine for common setup (file creation, object initialization), but should accept parameters for the specific values being tested. This makes tests self-contained and prevents hidden dependencies that could break when helper methods change. Pattern: If you assert a specific value, that value must be explicitly declared in the test's Arrange section.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 26 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 4531f11a7c4d
qa is an agent published in the GitHub repository vchelaru/XnaFiddle (13 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 647 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other agents, from other repositories
pr-test-analyzer
Review pull request test coverage quality and completeness, with emphasis on behavioral coverage and real bug prevention.
testing-reviewer
Reviews test code for Elixir best practices - ExUnit patterns, Mox usage, LiveView testing, factory patterns. Use proactively after writing tests or during code review.
test-gap-finder
Finds missing, weak, or stale test coverage in a diff. Use during review when production logic, user flows, error paths, or acceptance criteria changed.
ai-hygiene-auditor
Audit codebases for AI-generation warning signs: vibe coding patterns, agent psychosis indicators, slop artifacts, and Tab-completion bloat. Specialized complement to bloat-auditor.
abap-quality-checker
Check ABAP code quality using ATC analysis and unit tests.
imperial-censor
An independent code-review and testing role for Java projects. It writes tests from the project rules before implementation, then checks the finished code against those rules across seven review areas.