python-reviewer

python-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from vibeeval/vibecosystem. It costs 43 tokens per session (2,771 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A Python code-review agent focused on style, type hints, security, and performance. Python is a programming language, and a code review is a check of changes before they are accepted.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review changed Python files and run available checks from tools such as Ruff, mypy, Pylint, and Black.
Why use it?
It helps catch unsafe or hard-to-maintain Python code, such as injection risks, exposed secrets, unsafe deserialization, and path traversal.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code subagent (agents/*.md). Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Good fit Use it to review changed Python files and run available checks from tools such as Ruff, mypy, Pylint, and Black.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/vibeeval/vibecosystem/python-reviewer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vibeeval/vibecosystem

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for python-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/vibeeval/vibecosystem/python-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/vibeeval/vibecosystem/python-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/vibeeval/vibecosystem/python-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/vibeeval/vibecosystem/python-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for python-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/vibeeval/vibecosystem/python-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/vibeeval/vibecosystem/python-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 43 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 2,771 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 2 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00043 $0.02771
Opus 5.5 $0.00017 $0.01108
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00009 $0.00554
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00277

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 1de05ad64306, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

python-reviewer scanned grade A with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Makes network callslowCapability

Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.

os.system(f"curl {url}")

Runs shell commandslowCapability

Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.

- **Command Injection**: Unvalidated input in subprocess/os.system
Origin

Copies of this mod

1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:

agents/python-reviewer.md · 470 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 470 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are a senior Python code reviewer ensuring high standards of Pythonic code and best practices.

When invoked:

  1. Run git diff -- '*.py' to see recent Python file changes
  2. Run static analysis tools if available (ruff, mypy, pylint, black --check)
  3. Focus on modified .py files
  4. Begin review immediately

Security Checks (CRITICAL)

  • SQL Injection: String concatenation in database queries

    # Bad
    cursor.execute(f"SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = {user_id}")
    # Good
    cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = %s", (user_id,))
    
  • Command Injection: Unvalidated input in subprocess/os.system

    # Bad
    os.system(f"curl {url}")
    # Good
    subprocess.run(["curl", url], check=True)
    
  • Path Traversal: User-controlled file paths

    # Bad
    open(os.path.join(base_dir, user_path))
    # Good
    clean_path = os.path.normpath(user_path)
    if clean_path.startswith(".."):
        raise ValueError("Invalid path")
    safe_path = os.path.join(base_dir, clean_path)
    
  • Eval/Exec Abuse: Using eval/exec with user input

  • Pickle Unsafe Deserialization: Loading untrusted pickle data

  • Hardcoded Secrets: API keys, passwords in source

  • Weak Crypto: Use of MD5/SHA1 for security purposes

  • YAML Unsafe Load: Using yaml.load without Loader

Error Handling (CRITICAL)

  • Bare Except Clauses: Catching all exceptions

    # Bad
    try:
        process()
    except:
        pass
    
    # Good
    try:
        process()
    except ValueError as e:
        logger.error(f"Invalid value: {e}")
    
  • Swallowing Exceptions: Silent failures

  • Exception Instead of Flow Control: Using exceptions for normal control flow

  • Missing Finally: Resources not cleaned up

    # Bad
    f = open("file.txt")
    data = f.read()
    # If exception occurs, file never closes
    
    # Good
    with open("file.txt") as f:
        data = f.read()
    # or
    f = open("file.txt")
    try:
        data = f.read()
    finally:
        f.close()
    

Read the full file on GitHub · 470 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 470 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 1de05ad64306

Subscribe to this mod's changes

python-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository vibeeval/vibecosystem (541 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 2,771 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 2 findings (makes network calls, runs shell commands). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

security-reviewer

Security vulnerability detection and remediation specialist. Use PROACTIVELY after writing code that handles user input, authentication, API endpoints, or sensitive data. Flags secrets, SSRF, injection, unsafe crypto, and OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities.

affaan-m/ECC · 52 tokens

thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent

Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.

michael-denyer/pstack-claude · 68 tokens

predictive-analyst

Precognition agent. Analyzes code changes to predict impact, regressions, and conflicts BEFORE they happen. Uses dependency graphs and historical data.

softspark/ai-toolkit · 35 tokens

atomic-auditor

Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…

damusix/atomic-claude · 169 tokens

verification-subagent

Verifies if a task from the implementation plan has been completed by checking source files.

closedloop-ai/claude-plugins · 21 tokens

verifier

Verification agent for /craft:research-verify. Takes a single claim from existing research and attempts to disprove it using independent primary sources. Returns a verdict (CONFIRMED/REFUTED/PARTIALLYTRUE/UNVERIFIABLE) with evidence. NOT a researcher. Does not discover new topics or cast a wide net. Takes one claim…

drobins25/craft · 178 tokens