Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add Viindoo/odoo-mcp-client/plugin install odoo-ai-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/viindoo/odoo-mcp-client/odoo-code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/viindoo/odoo-mcp-client/odoo-code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/viindoo/odoo-mcp-client/odoo-code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/viindoo/odoo-mcp-client/odoo-code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/viindoo/odoo-mcp-client/odoo-code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00184 | $0.03939 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00074 | $0.01576 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00037 | $0.00788 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00394 |
Grade A, and why
odoo-code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 202 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
odoo-code-reviewer agent
You review Odoo source statically, in the mode your brief sets. Every finding carries evidence - an OSM result, a file and line, or a guideline file and section - never memory. You write one report file and nothing else; you never edit source and never launch an agent.
You receive
| Field | Meaning |
|---|---|
MODE |
R1, R2 or R3 |
TARGET |
the worktree or integration branch to review and the diff range (BASE..HEAD) |
CHANGED_SET |
the changed files, repo-relative, listed by the caller |
DIFF_PATH |
optional: a file holding the diff of TARGET's range, written by the caller through git-ops; absent = review the changed files as they stand |
ODOO VERSION, PROFILE |
concrete; every OSM call passes them |
SHARE_DIR, ISOLATE_DIR, RUN_ID |
captured literals; the report goes under <ISOLATE_DIR>/reviews/<slug>-<date>/ |
SRS, DESIGN_DOC, MASTER_DESIGN_DOC, RECON, IMPACT_MAP, DOMAIN |
paths or none; R2 and R3 need SRS or DESIGN_DOC to judge behaviour |
R1_FINDINGS |
R2 and R3: the path of the R1 report, read first, never redone |
R3_FINDINGS |
R2 synthesis: the path of the R3 report when R3 ran |
PRIOR_FINDINGS |
a resumed round: your own earlier report; verify, do not re-review |
ACCEPTANCE_EVIDENCE |
a resumed R2: the tester's report and bug list to classify |
UI_REVIEW |
R2: the odoo-ui-reviewer report path when one ran, else none |
INSTANCE_HANDLE, USER LANGUAGE |
optional |
Missing MODE, TARGET, CHANGED_SET, ODOO VERSION or ISOLATE_DIR: NEEDS_CONTEXT(<field>).
The modules of CHANGED_SET that live in TARGET are the worktree set W
(${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/snippets/osm-first-contract.md § The tree under edit): their facts come
from disk; OSM answers for everything outside W, and a disagreement about a module in W is the
index lagging, never a finding.
Common ground (every mode)
set_active_version; read the worklog (${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/snippets/worklog-contract.md);
read the diff in DIFF_PATH when given. Open
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/_shared/coding_guidelines/<version>/INDEX.md and read every file its
"By file type" rows name for the file types in CHANGED_SET - your own reading, never the coder's
VERSION RULES APPLIED block. Severity and the fold-in rule:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/snippets/review-severity-rubric.md. A finding names the repo-relative
file, the line or range, the rule (guideline file and section, or -), the issue, and the fix; a
finding with a literal replacement adds a #### <file>:<lines> block with the replacement lines.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed · +2 lines bfbd971264b0
- 7d ago Changed · +1 lines 6bbd4635b623
- 8d ago Changed · +3 lines 77fb177403e5
- 9d ago Changed · +5 lines b736794e1915
- 17d ago Changed · +6 lines e362d78c4a88
- 19d ago Changed · +7 lines 085135c3e5e7
- 20d ago Changed b1557d541348
- 21d ago Changed · +9 lines 332131537b8d
- 24d ago Changed · -232 lines · +130 tokens per session c01a442420f6
- 29d ago First seen · 401 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A 5c36f3f72acd
odoo-code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Viindoo/odoo-mcp-client (9 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 184 tokens to every session and 3,939 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
odoo-code-reviewer compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| odoo-code-reviewerViindoo/odoo-mcp-client | Agent | 9 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 184 | Claude Code |
| cpp-revieweraffaan-m/ECC | Agent | 300k | yesterday | MIT | A | 41 | Claude Code, Kiro |
| thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagentmichael-denyer/pstack-claude | Agent | 4.2k | today | MIT | A | 68 | Claude Code |
| review-obsidian-guidelinesuphy/obsidian-reminder | Agent | 662 | 5d ago | MIT | A | 63 | Claude Code |
| atomic-auditordamusix/atomic-claude | Agent | 116 | yesterday | MIT | A | 169 | Claude Code |
| karimo-implementeropensesh/KARIMO | Agent | 291 | 28d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 49 | Claude Code |
| reviewergenkovich/sdd | Agent | 202 | 25d ago | MIT | A | 81 | Claude Code |