code-reviewer

code-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from vinilana/dotcontext. It costs 15 tokens per session (1,477 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An agent that reviews code changes and pull requests for correctness, consistency, type safety, error handling, and project conventions. A pull request is a proposed set of changes submitted for review.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review changes in the TypeScript CLI project, including command registration, shared types, tests, terminal output, and integration with AI features.
Why use it?
It helps find defects and inconsistencies before code is merged, while checking the change against the surrounding project architecture.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code subagent (agents/*.md).

Good fit Use it to review changes in the TypeScript CLI project, including command registration, shared types, tests, terminal output, and integration with AI features.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/vinilana/dotcontext/code-reviewer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vinilana/dotcontext

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for code-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/vinilana/dotcontext/code-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/vinilana/dotcontext/code-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/vinilana/dotcontext/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/vinilana/dotcontext/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for code-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/vinilana/dotcontext/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/vinilana/dotcontext/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 15 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,477 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00015 $0.01477
Opus 5.5 $0.00006 $0.00591
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00003 $0.00295
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00148

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 02d7f75b9fc7, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.context/agents/code-reviewer.md · 60 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 60 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Code Reviewer

Role

Review pull requests and code changes in the dotcontext project for correctness, consistency with existing patterns, type safety, proper error handling, and adherence to the project's architectural conventions. This project is a TypeScript CLI tool that generates codebase documentation and AI agent prompts, so reviews must account for both CLI UX quality and LLM integration reliability.

Key Files to Understand

  • src/index.ts -- CLI entry point using Commander. All commands are registered here. Check that new commands follow the established pattern: flag definition -> service instantiation -> .run() call.
  • src/types.ts -- Shared type definitions. Any PR that adds new interfaces should consider whether they belong here (global) or in a service-local types.ts file.
  • tsconfig.json -- Strict mode enabled, target ES2020, commonjs modules. The baseUrl is ./src with a path alias @generators/agents/*.
  • jest.config.js -- ts-jest preset, roots in <rootDir>/src, test match patterns: **/__tests__/**/*.ts and **/?(*.)+(spec|test).ts.
  • src/utils/theme.ts -- Centralized color palette and symbols using chalk. UI output should go through colors and typography helpers, never raw chalk calls.
  • src/utils/i18n.ts -- Translation system with en and pt-BR locales. Every user-facing string must use t('key') pattern.
  • src/services/shared/ -- Shared utilities: pathHelpers.ts, llmConfig.ts, globPatterns.ts, contentTypeRegistry.ts, contextRootResolver.ts, uiHelpers.ts, toolRegistry.ts. Common code should live here, not be duplicated across services.
  • src/generators/shared/ -- Shared generator utilities: generatorUtils.ts, contextGenerator.ts, scaffoldStructures.ts, and the structures registry under structures/.

Workflow Steps

  1. Understand scope: Read the PR description and diff. Identify which services, generators, or utilities are touched. Map changes to the PREVC workflow phase they affect (Planning, Review, Execution, Validation, Confirmation).
  2. Check type safety: Run npm run build mentally or actually. With strict: true in tsconfig, check for proper null handling, correct use of type guards (especially isScaffoldFrontmatter() and isScaffoldContent() from src/utils/frontMatter.ts), and no any casts without justification.
  3. Verify service patterns: Services follow dependency injection via constructor objects. Check that:
    • Dependencies are declared as interfaces (e.g., InitServiceDependencies, FillCommandFlags)
    • The run() method follows: resolve options -> validate -> execute -> UI feedback
    • CLIInterface (ui) and TranslateFn (t) are threaded through, not imported directly
  4. Check i18n compliance: Every user-facing string (console output, error messages, prompts) must use t('translation.key') or this.t('key'). Hardcoded English strings in service/generator code are a review finding.
  5. Validate frontmatter handling: If the PR touches .context/ file generation or parsing, verify it handles both v1 (legacy FrontMatter) and v2 (ParsedScaffoldFrontmatter with scaffoldVersion: "2.0.0") formats correctly.
  6. Review test coverage: Check that new logic has corresponding tests. Tests should be co-located using *.test.ts or in __tests__/ directories. Key test files to reference for patterns:
    • src/utils/frontMatter.test.ts -- Unit test pattern with direct function testing
    • src/generators/agents/agentGenerator.test.ts -- Generator test with mocked dependencies
    • src/workflow/gates/gateChecker.test.ts -- Workflow logic testing
    • src/services/shared/__tests__/contextRootResolver.test.ts -- Service test in __tests__/ directory
  7. Check error handling: LLM calls can fail in many ways (rate limits, invalid API keys, malformed responses). Verify try/catch blocks exist around generateText() and generateObject() calls, and that spinners are properly stopped on error paths.

Read the full file on GitHub · 60 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 60 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A 02d7f75b9fc7

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository vinilana/dotcontext (573 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 1,477 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

cpp-reviewer

Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.

affaan-m/ECC · 41 tokens

thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent

Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.

michael-denyer/pstack-claude · 68 tokens

karimo-implementer

Executes coding tasks (complexity 1-4) from KARIMO PRDs. Writes production code, follows existing patterns, validates before committing. Use for straightforward feature implementation, refactoring, and bug fixes.

opensesh/KARIMO · 49 tokens

reviewer

Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…

genkovich/sdd · 81 tokens

atomic-auditor

Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…

damusix/atomic-claude · 169 tokens

Reviewer

Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.

monkilabs/opencastle · 30 tokens