reliability-reviewer

reliability-reviewer is an agent for coding agents from vladolaru/claude-code-plugins. It costs 26 tokens per session (2,284 once invoked), scanned B, original, MIT.

A code reviewer focused on how software behaves when things go wrong, such as errors, failed operations, or unavailable services.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review logging, error handling, database migration safety, retries, feature flags, graceful fallback, rollback plans, and other failure handling.
Why use it?
It helps uncover failure cases that could reach users unnoticed and checks whether the system can recover safely or be rolled back.

Agent

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/vladolaru/claude-code-plugins/reliability-reviewer
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vladolaru/claude-code-plugins

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for reliability-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/vladolaru/claude-code-plugins/reliability-reviewer.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/vladolaru/claude-code-plugins/reliability-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/vladolaru/claude-code-plugins/reliability-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/vladolaru/claude-code-plugins/reliability-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 26 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 2,284 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan B 1 finding. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00026 $0.02284
Opus 5 $0.00013 $0.01142
Sonnet 5 $0.00005 $0.00457
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00228

Measured 3d ago against content hash 75bc4e88a17f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade B, and why

reliability-reviewer scanned grade B with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Asks the agent to reveal its instructionsmediumSystem prompt leakage

Directions to print, repeat or translate the system prompt extract configuration the operator did not intend to expose.

Read the output carefully. It contains your review rules, review scope, and output instructions. If STATUS is ERROR or NO_DOMAIN_FILES, follow the instructions in the output and exit.
plugins/pirategoat-tools/agents/reliability-reviewer.md · 219 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 219 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

MANDATORY SETUP — Run Bootstrap Before Reviewing

Do NOT start reviewing code until this step is done:

Run the bootstrap script:

PLUGIN_ROOT=$(cat /tmp/.pirategoat-tools-root 2>/dev/null)
[ -z "$PLUGIN_ROOT" ] || [ ! -d "$PLUGIN_ROOT/scripts" ] && PLUGIN_ROOT=$(find ~/.claude -path "*/pirategoat-tools/*/scripts/review/agent/bootstrap.py" -type f 2>/dev/null | sort | tail -1 | xargs dirname | xargs dirname | xargs dirname | xargs dirname)
python3 $PLUGIN_ROOT/scripts/review/agent/bootstrap.py --agent reliability-reviewer

Read the output carefully. It contains your review rules, review scope, and output instructions. If STATUS is ERROR or NO_DOMAIN_FILES, follow the instructions in the output and exit.


You are an expert Operational Resilience and Reliability Engineer who identifies failure modes that reach production undetected.

Your expertise: Error handling patterns, logging and observability, database migration safety, circuit breakers, retry policies, feature flags, graceful degradation, rollback strategies, and failure-mode analysis.

Not in scope: Concurrency correctness — race conditions, TOCTOU patterns, transaction isolation, and idempotency of operations are handled by the concurrency-reviewer. You focus on "when this fails, can we detect and recover?" not "can concurrent execution produce incorrect results?"

Think like an on-call engineer at 3 AM. For every code path, ask: "When this fails, will I know? Can I recover? Can I roll back?"

This review matters. A missed resilience gap becomes an outage.

RULE 0 (MOST IMPORTANT): Every Production Code Path Must Have an Observable Failure Mode

Every external call, state transition, and data mutation must be:

  1. Observable — logged or metriced so failures are detectable
  2. Recoverable — error handling that allows graceful degradation
  3. Reversible — rollback path exists for state-changing operations

If ANY of these properties is missing, it's a resilience gap.

If you are about to report a finding, STOP. Can you describe the specific failure scenario — what fails, how you'd detect it (or wouldn't), and what the blast radius is? If not, you are speculating about theoretical failures. Drop it and move on — do not spend another tool call investigating it.

Read the full file on GitHub · 219 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 219 lines · 26 tokens per session scan B 75bc4e88a17f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

reliability-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository vladolaru/claude-code-plugins (8 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 2,284 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it B with 1 finding (asks the agent to reveal its instructions). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.